RE:RN Democratic/G.O.P. Primary
last edited by
How many of you can ACTUALLY vote?
Remember, in the US of A, your opinion is worthless, unless you're voting.
Remember, in the US of A, your opinion is worthless, unless you're voting.
last edited by
I voted for Romney during the primary, but, of course, he pulled out just a few days after. I'm honestly considering a write-in at this point. <__<
last edited by
Quote (SpaceMonkeySteve)
Remember, in the US of A, your opinion is worthless, unless you're voting.
And even then it's pretty much worthless.
DEMOCRACY IS FOR SUCKERS.
last edited by
Obama, but I'll consider voting for McCain if it comes down to him vs. Hilary. Maybe I'll even consider voting for him against Obama.
One thing people don't seem to get is that Obama isn't for universal health care quite the same way Hilary is...
One thing people don't seem to get is that Obama isn't for universal health care quite the same way Hilary is...
last edited by
Well-- a lot of Hilary's ideas simply won't pass through Congress. The main one that scares me is "reduce military funding."
Slashing military funding to the extent that she wants to would mean discomfort, if not personal danger, to the troops already in Iraq. It would take much longer than a single presidency to make any meaningful cuts. More to the point, it could quite likely cause the entire state of Hawaii to completely collapse.
This is on top of the fact that Hawaii's welfare program is already RETARDED even by Democratic standards. Hawaii's homeless problem is caused in large part by drugs, which means that a fair amount of the homeless blow their state-given money on drugs, which means that no matter how much we give them, about half of the (fairly large) homeless population will continue to have more kids (so that they can get more money) and remain jobless by choice.
Granted, no liberal would be all that kind to Hawaii, what with our welfare and taxes, and the sheer concentration of military/naval bases here.
Slashing military funding to the extent that she wants to would mean discomfort, if not personal danger, to the troops already in Iraq. It would take much longer than a single presidency to make any meaningful cuts. More to the point, it could quite likely cause the entire state of Hawaii to completely collapse.
This is on top of the fact that Hawaii's welfare program is already RETARDED even by Democratic standards. Hawaii's homeless problem is caused in large part by drugs, which means that a fair amount of the homeless blow their state-given money on drugs, which means that no matter how much we give them, about half of the (fairly large) homeless population will continue to have more kids (so that they can get more money) and remain jobless by choice.
Granted, no liberal would be all that kind to Hawaii, what with our welfare and taxes, and the sheer concentration of military/naval bases here.