I think you're misunderstanding something here. The general consensus that everyone has been giving you, (That it's bad.) you've been assuming that they are talking about the piece as an entire piece of work, and remind us that this is a rough draft.
In reality, everyone here knows completely that this is a very rough draft. Despite that, even for a roughest of rough drafts, this is terrible. This is not only bad for a rough draft, it's bad for a rough draft to a rough draft. I can understand running through really quick, and fixing spelling an punctuation later, it's a common tactic, and I'm not faulting you on it. I can tell that you put some serious work into putting extra detail into the description, and I can respect that too.
Now, to answer you last question. Yes, your description is terribly cliché, and quite frankly, boring to read. You, in packing in extra detail, have completely removed any good tempo to the line. It makes it a chore to read through all of the extra, pointless, detail. Sometimes you need to go with something simpler to get ahead.