You can easily press left and right to see more of the image...
Random Images (Closed)
last edited by
It's not that hard to estimate. Anything about as wide as the site's banner is going to break it.
My browser does not display said scroll buttons for left and right, and I must pick view image to see a whole image... meanwhile, the forum is messed up, and the whole thing can be sidestepped by simply linking the image. >>;
My browser does not display said scroll buttons for left and right, and I must pick view image to see a whole image... meanwhile, the forum is messed up, and the whole thing can be sidestepped by simply linking the image. >>;
last edited by
You mean your KEYBOARD does not have LEFT and RIGHT buttons? It kinda looks like a D-PAD.
last edited by
Well, I learned something new today. I had assumed you meant a scroll bar. >>;
Nonetheless, the argument still stands that it makes the page harder to follow.
Nonetheless, the argument still stands that it makes the page harder to follow.
last edited by
Quote (commondragon)
Edit by Twi: STOP POSTING BOARD-BREAKING IMAGES! I swear to god, I'm gonna start personally handing out warns for images that break the board wrappers. If you have to scroll horizontally to see the entire image, it's too big. Link it, don't post it.
Oh noes, link.
And define 'board-breaking images'. Which width IS allowed?
last edited by
Shuryou, you're getting flamey. On top of that, you're repeatedly posting board-breaking images for what looks like multiple people. It's annoying.
Warn.
EDIT: Hm... what exactly is board-breaking? Well, if it would break the board wrapppers on a 1280×1024 resolution, it's board-breaking. I'll do a few tests to check the exact amount.
-Twi
Warn.
EDIT: Hm... what exactly is board-breaking? Well, if it would break the board wrapppers on a 1280×1024 resolution, it's board-breaking. I'll do a few tests to check the exact amount.
-Twi
last edited by
But I use a 1280x1024 resolution and it NEVER breaks the forum for me. All of my images just fit between the edges so where is the exact problem?
Sidenote... While you're at it. Define 'flamey' for me please... I find it vague while I was being sarcastic. I thought pressing left and right to scroll was common sense when using internet browsers. Also... This is called RANDOM IMAGES, so no one is even forcing anyone to come here. I'm only linking wallpapers of which I know that break the wrappers. <_<
Sidenote... While you're at it. Define 'flamey' for me please... I find it vague while I was being sarcastic. I thought pressing left and right to scroll was common sense when using internet browsers. Also... This is called RANDOM IMAGES, so no one is even forcing anyone to come here. I'm only linking wallpapers of which I know that break the wrappers. <_<
last edited by
As an afternote, it doesn't even have to be defined beforehand, pixel by pixel. If you notice that you have to scroll to see it, or somebody complains that they have to, simply go back and edit your post to make it a link instead.
last edited by
Did I say 1280×1024? My bad, getting my resolutions confused.
I MEANT 1024x768. That's the resolution I've been using, and your stuff breaks the wrappers for me.
-Twi
I MEANT 1024x768. That's the resolution I've been using, and your stuff breaks the wrappers for me.
-Twi
last edited by
If I use a 800x600 resolution from now on, can I complain as well? It's the right I have by being a member apparently.
last edited by
I've always used "View Image" to see wrapper-breaking pics, then used the appropriate scroll bar buttons. It works for me, although it's more of a nuisance and that's where my part of the argument comes from. You can't blame me for not realizing there was another way to do it when I've never been forced to search for a conclusion to a degree that I discover the function... XD