Complaints

This topic is for complaining about stuff. Note that I say complaining and not whining. Anyway, I'll kick it off. im has been bothing me a long time so...

I feel obligated to say something about Aim, because, as the Talmud says, "Silence is akin to assent." Before I launch into my main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) Aim's hypocritical maneuvers are part of the workforce training agenda for the global planned economy, and (2) as a result of that, Aim demands his freedoms while unhesitatingly and hypocritically encroaching upon the rights of others. Now that you know where I stand on those issues, I can safely say that no one likes being attacked by scurrilous Aim clones. Even worse, Aim exploits our fear of those attacks -- which he claims will evolve sooner or later into biological, chemical, or nuclear attacks -- as a pretext to cure the evil of discrimination with more discrimination. If you think that's scary, then you should remember that Aim's thesis is that the majority of peremptory good-for-nothings are heroes, if not saints. That's totally daft, you say? Good; that means you're finally catching on. The next step is to observe that we mustn't let Aim make mountains out of molehills. That would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy. Although Aim has managed to avoid indictment, or even a consensus that he did anything illegal, he possesses no significant intellectual skills whatsoever and has no interest in erudition. Heck, he can't even spell or define "erudition", much less achieve it. Lexiphanicism has served as the justification for the butchering, torture, and enslavement of more people than any other "ism". That's why it's Aim's favorite; it makes it easy for him to blend together isolationism and mysticism in a train wreck of monumental proportions. Aim's a psychologically defective person. He's what the psychiatrists call a constitutional psychopath or a sociopath.

Racialism is the modern analogue of slavery -- and Aim knows it. Furthermore, his reinterpretations of historic events cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that Aim can be trusted to judge the rest of the world from a unique perch of pure wisdom. Well, sure; sometimes, what you don't know can hurt you, but that doesn't change reality.

Aim gives new meaning to the word "militant". The destruction of the Tower of Babel, be it a literal truth, an allegory, or a mere story based upon cultural archetypes, illustrates this truth plainly. He sees himself as a postmodern equivalent of Marx's proletariat, revolutionizing the world by wresting it from its oppressors (viz., those who convince tendentious, uncompromising sods to stop supporting Aim and tolerating his sentiments).

One thing is certain: Throughout history, there has been a clash between those who wish to lay out some ideas and interpretations that hold the potential for insight and those who wish to substitute rumor and gossip for bona fide evidence. Naturally, Aim belongs to the latter category. Who could have guessed that he would dismantle the family unit? To put it another way, how long shall there continue directionless witlings to vend and moonstruck stirrers to gulp so low a piece of McCarthyism as his insults? It is bootless to speculate on the matter, but it should be noted that not only does Aim desecrate personal religious objects, but he then commands his companions, "Go, and do thou likewise."

Aim coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his plaints sound like they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary. A central point of his belief systems is the notion that we can change the truth if we don't like it the way it is. Perhaps Aim should take some new data into account and revisit that notion. I think he'd find that the best thing about him is the way that he encourages us to champion the force of goodness against the greed of effete champions of deceit, lies, theft, plunder, and rapine. No, wait; Aim doesn't encourage that. On the contrary, he discourages us from admitting that he plans to cast ordinary consumption and investment decisions in the light of high religious purpose. The result will be an amalgam of grungy recidivism and officious paternalism, if such a monster can be imagined.

Aim's idea of a good time is to insult my intelligence. Period, finis, and Q.E.D. There is no contradiction here; even though Aim has made some imprecise statements and statements that ought to have had all sorts of qualifications and reservations attached to them, you mustn't forget that you might have heard the story that Aim once agreed to help us promote peace, prosperity, and quality of life, both here and abroad. No one has located the document in which Aim said that. No one has identified when or where Aim said that. That's because he never said it. As you might have suspected, Aim's diatribes are extensive and frequent and are laden with orchidaceous words like "counterrevolutionize" and "eulamellibranchiate". I could write pages on the subject, but the following should suffice. The point is that if everyone spent just five minutes a day thinking about ways to take the initiative to rub Aim's nose in his own hypocrisy, we'd all be a lot better off. Is five minutes a day too much to ask for the promise of a better tomorrow? I hope not, but then again, Aim's strictures promote a redistribution of wealth. This is always an appealing proposition for Aim's faithfuls because much of the redistributed wealth will undoubtedly end up in the hands of the redistributors as a condign reward for their loyalty to Aim. Make special note of that point, because Aim has no sense of personal boundaries. I don't think anyone questions that. But did you know that he is morally irresponsible and mentally feeble?

There is no inconsistency here; a self-serving mentality and a mealymouthed sense of despotism create fertile soil for psychotic bigamists to call for a return to that which wasn't particularly good in the first place. I challenge him to move from his broad derogatory generalizations to specific instances to prove otherwise. As one commentator put it, you should not ask, "In view of Aim's delusional morals, what does it make sense for us to do now?", but rather, "What does Aim hope to achieve by repeatedly applying his lips to the posteriors of self-satisfied, inaniloquent malingerers?". The latter question is the better one to ask, because Aim proclaims at every opportunity that he'd never call for ritualistic invocations of needlessly formal rules. The gentleman doth protest too much, methinks.

Given the amount of misinformation that Aim is circulating, I must undoubtedly point out that his apologues are more than just haughty. They're a revolt against nature. His true goal is to incite pogroms, purges, and other mayhem. All the statements that his confreres make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing to straighten out Aim's thinking. You know what? Aim keeps insisting that we should derive moral guidance from his glitzy, multi-culti, hip-hop, consumption-oriented drug-induced ravings. To me, there is something fundamentally wrong with that story. Maybe it's that the ultimate aim of Aim's publicity stunts is to restructure society as a pyramid with Aim at the top, Aim's associates directly underneath, crafty malcontents beneath them, and the rest of at the bottom. This new societal structure will enable Aim to prevent me from sleeping soundly at night, which makes me realize that he is reluctant to resolve problems. He always just looks the other way and hopes no one will notice that we must work together to supply the missing ingredient that could stop the worldwide slide into mercantalism. What can you do to help? For starters, you might want to question Aim's authority. I personally derive great satisfaction in doing that sort of thing because Aim contends that his rancorous gang is a benign and charitable agency and that, therefore, he is the way, the truth, and the light. This bizarre pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions. For example, it convinces wayward slackers (as distinct from the laughable overbearing-types who prefer to chirrup while hopping from cloud to cloud in Nephelococcygia) that it's inappropriate to teach children right from wrong. In reality, contrariwise, we must issue a call to conscience and reason. If we fail in this, we are not failing someone else; we are not disrupting some interest separate from ourselves. Rather, it is we who suffer when we neglect to observe that if Aim thinks that he can make me tear off all my clothes and run naked down the street, then he's barking up the wrong tree. There are two things about Aim's assertions that I find personally offensive, entirely unethical, and quite sad. One is that Aim's stratagems are founded on bald-faced lies. And the other is that Aim thinks we want him to keep us perennially behind the eight ball. Excuse me, but maybe he is guided by the ignis fatuus of nepotism. That's pretty transparent. What's not so transparent is the answer to the following question: How can we break his hypnotic spell over blasphemous flimflammers? A clue might be that he wants to lead to the destruction of the human race. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis.

It should come as no shock to anyone that Aim's stances represent a backward step of hundreds of years, a backward step into a chasm with no bottom save the endless darkness of death. People like Aim make me sick. Of that I am certain, because you might say, "Aim's pleas are shrouded in a fog of alarmism." Fine, I agree. But Aim should reserve his stereotypes and labels and remember to treat others with a bit more respect and equality. Well, that's a bit too general of a statement to have much meaning, I'm afraid. So let me instead explain my point as follows: I want to make this clear, so that those who do not understand deeper messages embedded within sarcastic irony -- and you know who I'm referring to -- can process my point. Aim speaks like a true defender of the status quo -- a status quo, we should not forget, that enables him to promote, foster, and institute favoritism.

My usual response to Aim's proposed social programs is this: Aim's minions are nothing more than unreasonable, Pecksniffian meatheads. However, such a response is much too glib and perhaps a little rotten, so let me be more specific. Aim's occasional demonstrations of benevolence are not genuine. Nor are his promises. In fact, we need to look beyond the most immediate and visible problems with Aim. We need to look at what is behind these problems and understand that Aim's brethren don't want to make their own decisions but want Aim to do their thinking for them. If you don't believe me, see for yourself. People often get the impression that barbaric, namby-pamby braggadocios and Aim's mercenaries are separate entities. Not so. When one catches cold, the other sneezes. As proof, note that honest people will admit that lackluster heresiarchs speak in order to conceal -- or at least to veil -- their thoughts. Concerned people are not afraid to force Aim into early retirement. And sensible people know that Aim says that his blessing is the equivalent of a papal imprimatur. This is at best wrong. At worst, it is a lie. Which brings me to my point. In summary, it is my prayer that people everywhere will join me in my quest to speak out against behavior and speech that is intended to enthrone falsehood in the very center of human thought.

Stop using wickedly cool internet generators.

Poor Aim..

Scratch that-- I've seen the light. Aim is undoubtedly an evil that only complaining can quell.

Allow me the honor of giving you a brief lesson in Aim's many damnable attributes. You see, I decidedly believe that Aim's bedfellows fight more for the negative destruction of opposing ideologies than for the positive promotion of their own. And because of that belief, I'm going to throw politeness and inoffensiveness to the winds. In this letter, I'm going to be as rude and crude as I know how, to reinforce the point that Aim's solutions were never about tolerance and equality. That was just window dressing for the "innocents". Rather, we have a dilemma of leviathan proportions on our hands: Should we work beyond the predatory plasticity of Aim's insinuations, or is it sufficient to make efforts directed towards broad, long-term social change? We must unquestionably ask ourselves questions like that before it's too late, before Aim gets the opportunity to gain a respectable foothold for his immature undertakings. On the surface, it would seem merely that he is a loose cannon. But the truth is that I welcome his comments. However, he needs to realize that he has spent untold hours trying to resort to underhanded tactics. During that time, did it ever once occur to him that his legatees favor a lifestyle that is as self-centered as his stances? The answer is quite simple. I already listed several possibilities, but because Aim lacks the ability to remember beyond the last two seconds of his life, I will restate what I said before, for his sake: Everything I've said so far is by way of introduction to the key point I want to make in this letter. My key point is that for the nonce, he is content to declare a national emergency, round up everyone who disagrees with him, and put them in concentration camps. But quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "predisadvantageously", he will worsen an already unstable situation.

By brainwashing his supporters with Dadaism, Aim makes them easy to lead, easy to program, and easy to enslave. Will someone please explain to me what it is in our lives that can possibly make someone shout obscenities at passers-by? Because I certainly have no idea.

If an attempt to dig a grave in which to bury liberty and freedom isn't deranged, it certainly is intransigent. During the first half of the 20th century, feudalism could have been practically identified with oligarchism. Today, it is not so clear who can properly be called a gormless, ribald megalomaniac. Although the themes in Aim's views are limited, a person who wants to get ahead should try to understand the long-range consequences of his/her actions. Aim has never had that faculty. He always does what he wants to do at the moment and figures he'll be able to lie himself out of any problems that arise. As it turns out, if you think that he has the authority to issue licenses for practicing Trotskyism, then you're suffering from very serious nearsightedness. You're focusing too much on what Aim wants you to see and failing to observe many other things of much greater importance, such as that throughout history, there has been a clash between those who wish to empower the oppressed to control their own lives and those who wish to use organized violence to suppress opposition. Naturally, Aim belongs to the latter category.

Aim has no great love of democracy or egalitarianism. And let me tell you, my comments about Aim can serve as a provisional response to his cock-and-bull stories until a more comprehensive treatment becomes available. He may mean well but he lives in a mental and emotional la-la land. In fact, I have said that to Aim on many occasions and I will keep on saying it until he stops trying to plague our minds. Aim thinks it would be a great idea to move impetuous favoritism from the brutish fringe into a realm of respectability. Even if we overlook the logistical impossibilities of such an idea, the underlying premise is still flawed. If you agree, read on. He says that the only way to expand one's mind is with drugs -- or maybe even chocolate. You know, he can lie as much as he wants but he can't change the facts. If he could, he'd indubitably prevent anyone from hearing that if this letter did nothing else but serve as a beacon of truth, it would be worthy of reading by all right-thinking people. However, this letter's role is much greater than just to free people from the spell of particularism that he has cast over them.

Essentially, if it were up to Aim, schoolchildren would be taught reading, 'riting, and racism. One thing is certain: He wants us to believe that we can solve all of our problems by giving him lots of money. We might as well toss that money down a well, because we'll never see it again. What we will see, however, is that any effort to negotiate with Aim or appease him is akin to spitting into a hurricane to quiet its fury. If that fact hurts, get over it; it's called reality. And for another dose of reality, consider that no matter what else we do, our first move must be to educate everyone about how few people realize that it would be nugatory to discuss Aim's schemes without first mentioning that Aim's obiter dicta, when taken as a whole, are unbridled. That's the first step: education. Education alone is not enough, of course. We must also combat the impulsive ideology of egotism that has infected the minds of so many venal, hectoring Neanderthals. Aim will probably throw another hissy fit if we don't let him cause this country to flounder on the shoals of self-interest, corruption, and chaos. At least putting up with another Aim hissy fit is easier than convincing Aim's assistants that if Aim gets his way, I might very well crawl under a rock and die.

We are observing the change in our society's philosophy and values from freedom and justice to corruption, decay, cynicism, and injustice. All of these "values" are artistically incorporated in one person: Aim. Assume for a moment that his rejoinders are a veritable dictionary and synonymicon of simplism. It therefore follows that it's easy to tell if he's lying. If his lips are moving, he's lying. Of course, we've tolerated Aim's profligate rantings long enough. It's time to lose our patience and chill our kindness. It's time to focus on what unites rather than divides us. It's time to shout to the world that we must remove the misunderstanding that he has created in the minds of myriad people throughout the world if we are ever to challenge Aim's destructive, flippant assumptions about merit. Yes, this is a bold, audacious, even unprecedented undertaking. Yes, it lacks any realistic guarantee of success. However, it is an undertaking that we must definitely pursue because Aim's secret agents get so hypnotized by his simplistic "good guys and bad guys" approach to history that they do not hear what he is really saying. So what's the connection between that and his remonstrations? The connection is that ignorance is bliss. This may be why Aim's encomiasts are generally all smiles. While there is inevitable overlap at the edges of political movements, I am sick of our illustrious "leaders" treading on eggshells so as not to upset Aim. Here's what I have to say to them: I, not being one of the many intrusive, immoral suborners of perjury of this world, have a New Year's resolution for Aim: He should pick up a book before he jumps to the dastardly conclusion that jingoism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society.

For the moment, Aim makes no secret of the fact that someone has to be willing to do something good for others. Even if it's not polite to do so. Even if it hurts a lot of people's feelings. Even if everyone else is pretending that he has a duty to conceal the facts and lie to the rest of us, under oath if necessary, perjuring himself to help disseminate the True Faith of larrikinism. Is there anyone else out there who's noticed that I challenge him to tell me what, if anything, in this letter is not entirely truthful? I ask because when I say that his obloquies are worthless, I mean it. I don't mean that they remind me of something worthless or that they have one or two worthless characteristics. I mean that they are worthless. In fact, the most worthless thing about them is the way that they prevent people from seeing that it strikes me as amusing that Aim complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! He does nothing but complain.

Aim has a hidden agenda. End of story. Actually, I should add that his pea-brained attempt to construct a creative response to my previous letter was absolutely pitiful. Really, Aim, stringing together a bunch of solecistic insults and seemingly random babble is hardly effective. It simply proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that his philosophies are an icon for the deterioration of the city, for its slow slide into crime, malaise, and filth. Nonetheless, Aim has compiled an impressive list of grievances against me. Not only are all of these grievances completely fictitious, but I am certain that if I asked the next person I meet if he would want Aim to play the blame game, he would say no. Yet we all stand idly by while Aim claims that he has answers to everything. If you intend to challenge someone's assertions, you need to present a counterargument. He provides none.

In other words, we can and we must protect ourselves by any means necessary against the covinous bestiality of namby-pamby, prurient hippies. So don't feed me any phony baloney about how he is a tireless protector of civil rights and civil liberties for all people. That's just not true. Whereas Aim claims that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius, I claim that either he has no real conception of the sweep of history, or he is merely intent on winning some debating pin by trying to pierce a hole in my logic with "facts" that are taken out of context.

It is hard to decide what is stronger in Aim: his incredible stupidity as far as any real knowledge or ability is concerned, or the nasty insolence of his behavior. The essential point, however, is the following: I have traveled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people. I can therefore assure you that I am not a robot. I am a thinking, feeling, human being. As such, I get teary-eyed whenever I see Aim achieve total world domination. It makes me want to stop defending the illiterate, scurrilous status quo and, instead, implement a bold, new agenda for change, which is why I'm so eager to tell you that Aim claims that the Universe belongs to him by right. I respond that in times of economic, social, or political crisis, small groups that consign most of us to the role of his servants or slaves suddenly gain a mass following. I am a law-and-order kind of person. I hate to see crimes go unpunished. That's why I indisputably hope that Aim serves a long prison term for his illegal attempts to understate the negative impact of incendiarism. Anyway, I hope I've made my point, which is that this makes the issue an even greater tragedy.

...Where can I get me one o' those?

I'd like to take a minute of your time to share some of my thoughts about Zanallen with you. One of my objectives is to provide some balance to Zanallen's one-sided grievances and encourage others to do the same. While there is no evidence that we can't afford to be so piteous in such difficult times, it is clear that if we let him deprive individuals of the right to operate on today's real -- not tomorrow's ideal -- political terrain, then greed, corruption, and plagiarism will characterize the government. Oppressive measures will be directed against citizens. And lies and deceit will be the stock-in-trade of the media and educational institutions. This is not to say that his weltanschauung is that he is forward-looking, open-minded, and creative. It is merely to point out that his personal attacks are rife with contradictions and difficulties; they're completely vengeful, meet no objective criteria, and are unsuited for a supposedly educated population. And as if that weren't enough, his provocateurs often reverse the normal process of interpretation. That is, they value the unsaid over the said, the obscure over the clear.

Are Zanallen's reinterpretations of historic events good for the country? The nation's suicide statistics, drug statistics, crime statistics, divorce statistics, and mental illness statistics give us part of the answer. These statistics should make it clear that my cause is to work together towards a shared vision. I call upon men and women from all walks of life to support my cause with their life-affirming eloquence and indomitable spirit of human decency and moral righteousness. Only then will the whole world realize that when I say that I am fed up with Zanallen's malignant and phlegmatic behavior, this does not, I repeat, does not mean that he could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else. This is a common fallacy held by unscrupulous rumormongers.

This state of affairs demands the direct assault on those Pecksniffian roorbacks that seek to traduce and discredit everyone but the worst classes of neurotic personæ non gratæ there are. Zanallen shouldn't create a world sunk in the most abject superstition, fanaticism, and ignorance. That would be like asking a question at a news conference and, too angry and passionate to wait for the answer, exiting the auditorium before the response. Both of those actions reduce human beings to the status of domestic animals.

In other words, it would be wrong to imply that Zanallen is involved in some kind of conspiracy to divert us from proclaiming what in our innermost conviction is absolutely necessary. It would be wrong because his propositions are far beyond the conspiracy stage. Not only that, but his crazy game of chess -- the unregenerate chess of solipsism -- has continued for far too long. It's time to checkmate this disruptive galoot and show him that if he were paying attention -- which it would seem he is not, as I've already gone over this -- he'd see that what he is doing is not an innocent, recreational sort of thing. It is a criminal activity, it is an immoral activity, it is a socially destructive activity, and it is a profoundly worthless activity. Those of you who thought that Zanallen was finally going to leave us alone are in for a big surprise, because Zanallen recently announced his plans to expand, augment, and intensify the size and intrusiveness of his coalition. Do his representatives act against injustice, whether it concerns drunk driving, domestic violence, or even Trotskyism? No, that would be the correct and logical thing to do. Instead, they turn fast-buck artists loose against us good citizens.

It's possible that Zanallen doesn't realize this because he has been ingrained with so much of nonrepresentationalism's propaganda. If that's the case, I recommend that we shoo him away like the annoying bug that he is. Maybe it's just me, but don't you think that he is nuttier than squirrel dung? He is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, Zanallen's willingness to spam the Internet with unsolicited unpatriotic, scornful junk e-mail sets a new record for brazenness.

Do you really think that his debauches are the result of a high-minded urge to do sociological research, as Zanallen claims? Wake up! Zanallen simply regurgitates the empty arguments that have been fed to him over the years. Zanallen may mean well but his apparatchiks say, "Profits come before people." Yes, I'm afraid they really do talk like that. It's the only way for them to conceal that Zanallen, in his typical dereliction-of-duty mode, is trying hard to prevent me from getting my work done. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that I once told him that batty anarchists are unable to see that the most gutless bigamists you'll ever see speak in order to conceal -- or at least to veil -- their thoughts. How did he respond to that? He proceeded to curse me off using a number of colorful expletives not befitting this letter, which serves only to show that there are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and Zanallen doing some humorless thing every few weeks.

While there's no dispute that Zanallen's smarmy and probably a little maladroit, he's also cunning, implacable, fanatic, and ruthless. Why else would he recruit and encourage young people to break our country's national and patriotic backbone and make it ripe for the slave's yoke of international prætorianism, just as older drug dealers use young kids to push drugs? Stick your nose into anything Zanallen has written recently, and you'll get a good whiff of officious elitism. What really irks me is that he has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let him irritate an incredible number of people or he'll burn his opponents at the stake.

Naturally, I do not find scare tactics that are blathering, unrestrained, and wishy-washy to be "funny". Maybe I lack a sense of humor, but maybe I, speaking as someone who is not an insincere protestor, have begged Zanallen's lickspittles to step forth and provide an antidote to contemporary manifestations of abusive, deceitful fetishism. To date, not a single soul has agreed to help in this fashion. Are they worried about how Zanallen might retaliate? While I don't know the answer to that particular question, I do know that what we're involved in with Zanallen is not a game. It's the most serious possible business, and every serious person -- every person with any shred of a sense of responsibility -- must concern himself with it. Zanallen's invectives have served as a powerful weapon with which amateurish cult leaders can pit race against race, religion against religion, and country against country. So let Zanallen call me meretricious. I call him craven. Someone needs to perform noble deeds. Who's going to do it? Zanallen? I think not.

Thanks to Zanallen, I'm now suffering from post-traumatic stress syndrome. Although others may disagree with that claim, few would dispute that Zanallen has a talent for inventing fantasy worlds in which violence and prejudice are funny. Then again, just because Zanallen is a prolific fantasist doesn't mean that he has a "special" perspective on cameralism which carries with it a "special" right to blame those who have no power to change the current direction of events. Yes, I realize that his tricks prove that he did little to no research before concluding that no one is smart enough to see through his transparent lies, but for the sake of brevity I've had to express myself in simplified terms. Having studied his charges and finding them groundless, I must now tell the world that even when Zanallen isn't lying, he's using facts, emphasizing facts, bearing down on facts, sliding off facts, quietly ignoring facts, and, above all, interpreting facts in a way that will enable him to break down our communities.

Zanallen's proxies' thinking is fenced in by many constraints. Their minds are not free because they dare not be. One does not have to feed blind hatred in order to offer true constructive criticism -- listening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problem. It is an asinine person who believes otherwise. Sorry for babbling so much, but to make up for all of the time he's wasted blathering, Zanallen should step aside and let me do something good for others.

Mwee hee hee.

The following are simply some random thoughts that have been rattling about my head of late and that I'd like to let out -- a little house cleaning, if you will. Before I launch into my rant, permit me the prelude caveat that Shuryou's stratagems are an icon for the deterioration of the city, for its slow slide into crime, malaise, and filth. I surely hate having to keep reminding everybody of this, but last summer, I attempted what I knew would be a hopeless task. I tried to convince Shuryou that he has come very, very close to making me become the target of prejudice, ridicule, discrimination, and physical violence. As I expected, Shuryou was absolutely unconvinced. When a mistake is made, the smart thing to do is to admit it and reverse course. That takes real courage. The way that Shuryou stubbornly refuses to own up to his mistakes serves only to convince me that I, for one, am not concerned with rumors or hearsay about him. I am interested only in ascertained facts attested by published documents, and in these primarily as an illustration that Shuryou recently went through an absenteeism phase in which he tried repeatedly to discredit legitimate voices in the phallocentrism debate. In fact, I'm not convinced that this phase of his has entirely passed. My evidence is that it seems that no one else is telling you that most acts of post-structuralism are committed not by nasty, chthonic lowbrows but by Shuryou's lieutenants in an attempt to use scapegoating as a foil to draw anger away from more accurate targets. So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, Shuryou's zingers are merely a stalking horse. They mask his secret intention to abandon the idea of universal principles and focus illegitimately on the particular. Although the themes in Shuryou's prophecies are limited, if one believes statements like, "Human life is expendable," one is, in effect, supporting obscene pissants.

Aside from the fact that justice and humanity are entirely on our side and nothing but illegality and barbarity are on Shuryou's, some reputed -- as opposed to reputable -- members of Shuryou's army of rancorous, filthy hucksters quite adamantly suspect that clever one-liners are a valid substitute for actual thinking. I find it rather astonishing that anyone could feel such a thing, but then again, all of the bad things that are currently going on are a symptom of Shuryou's reprehensible rodomontades. They are not a cause; they are an effect. Who else but Shuryou would have the brass to mold the mind of virtually every citizen -- young or old, rich or poor, simple or sophisticated? No one. And where does that brass come from? It comes from a sure knowledge that he can retreat into his "victim" status if anyone calls him to account.

Because at the heart of the problem is Shuryou's obliviousness to history, his moral cowardice masked in bold rhetoric, and his overwhelmingly shallow political posturing, because I find his blanket statements to be a perversion of the truth, and because common sense should render unwarranted any claim that merit is adequately measured by his methods and qualifications, we can conclude that in public, Shuryou vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin. But when nobody's looking, Shuryou never fails to undermine the current world order. He likes to quote all of the saccharine, sticky moralisms about "human rights" and the evils of blackguardism. But as soon as we stop paying attention, Shuryou invariably instructs his agents provocateurs to sugarcoat the past and dispense false optimism for the future. Then, when someone notices, the pattern repeats from the beginning. Though this game may seem perverse beyond belief to any sane individual, it makes perfect sense in light of Shuryou's abysmal apologues.

What if we collectively just told Shuryou's legatees, "Sure, go ahead and control your bank account, your employment, your personal safety, and your mind. Have fun!"? That would be worse than ostentatious; it would stonewall on issues in which taxpayers see a vital public interest. Instead of friends, Shuryou has victims and slaves who end up as victims. I honestly feel sorry for the lot of them. I also feel that Shuryou occasionally shows what appears to be warmth, joy, love, or compassion. You should realize, however, that these positive expressions are more feigned than experienced and invariably serve an ulterior motive, such as to fill our children's minds with stuck-up and debasing superstitions.

Shuryou has deported himself as an enemy of peace and harmony. That conclusion is not based on some sort of bookish philosophy or on Shuryou-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that if we provide an atmosphere of mutual respect, free from sectarianism, vandalism, and all other forms of prejudice and intolerance, then the sea of despotism, on which Shuryou so heavily relies, will begin to dry up. In asserting that he is a bearer and agent of the Creator's purpose, he demonstrates an astounding narrowness of vision. Shuryou, get a life! While perhaps offensive to some readers, only a direct quote can fully convey the humorless nature and content of his revenge fantasies: "Attention, goons! Your orders are to infiltrate and then dominate and control the mass media, and to do so at any cost." Some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that I intend to keep writing letters like this one until he changes his ways. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation.

While Shuryou puts on a good dog and pony show, his claims have created a balmy, asinine universe devoid of logic and evidence. Only within this universe does it make sense to say that unfounded attacks on character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best way to make a point. Only within this universe does it make sense to tear down everything that can possibly be regarded as a support of cultural elevation. And, only if we evaluate the tactics he has used against me can we destroy this unsympathetic, sniffish universe of his and champion the poor and oppressed against the evil of Shuryou. For reasons which I will adumbrate presently, if I didn't sincerely believe that such conduct as Shuryou's induced the despotism of Cromwell and the two Bonapartes, then I wouldn't be writing this letter. When I first heard about his morals, I dismissed them as merely militant. But when I later learned that Shuryou wants me to sink into a miasma of doubt and alienation, I realized that Shuryou contends that he understands the difference between civilization and savagery and that, therefore, ethical responsibility is merely a trammel of earthbound mortals and should not be required of a demigod like him. This bizarre pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions. For example, it convinces truculent, morally crippled ignoramuses (as distinct from the fickle cutthroats who prefer to chirrup while hopping from cloud to cloud in Nephelococcygia) that we have too much freedom. In reality, contrariwise, Shuryou is thoroughly mistaken if he believes that it's okay if his ruses initially cause our quality of life to degrade because "sometime", "someone" will do "something" "somehow" to counteract that trend.

Since I don't know Shuryou that well, I'll have to be a bit presumptuous when I say that one of his co-conspirators once said, "We can stop commercialism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for bloody-minded egotists." Now that's pretty funny, of course, but I didn't include that quote just to make you laugh. I included it to convince you that my position is that what goes around comes around. He, in contrast, argues that Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs. This disagreement merely scratches the surface of the ideological chasm festering between me and Shuryou. The only rational way to bridge this chasm is for him to admit that I recently informed him that his helpers censor any incomplicitous analects. Shuryou said he'd "look further into the matter." Well, not too much further; after all, I wonder if he really believes the things he says. He knows they're not true, doesn't he? Apparently, even know-it-all Shuryou doesn't know the answer to that one. It wouldn't even matter much if he did, given that he has two imperatives. The first is to transform our society into a Pecksniffian war machine. The second imperative is to prevent us from recognizing the vast and incomparable achievements, contributions, and discoveries that are the product of our culture. By now, the reader has discerned that Shuryou doesn't reck one whit about how others might feel. So let me just add that his projects are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of "tradition". Funny, that was the same term that Shuryou's coadjutors, who are legion, once used to create a mass psychology of fear about an imminent terrorist threat.

Shuryou might place prissy gutter-dwellers at the head of a nationwide kakistocracy sooner than you think. What are we to do then? Place blinders over our eyes and hope we don't see the horrible outcome? I'm sure he wouldn't want me to eavesdrop on his secret conversations. So why does Shuryou want to misdirect our efforts into fighting each other rather than into understanding the nature and endurance of slatternly recidivism? I would venture the answer has something to do with antiheroism. To elaborate, this letter should be regarded as the beginning, not the end, of my stance against Shuryou. That's self-evident, and even Shuryou would probably agree with me on that. Even so, if I had to choose the most anal-retentive specimen from his welter of sullen gabble, it would have to be his claim that every word that leaves his mouth is teeming with useful information. Oh, and one more thing. You can see where this is going. Let's remember that.

In point of fact, Shuryou is guilty of at least one criminal offense. In addition, he frequently exhibits less formal criminal behavior, such as deliberate and even gleeful cruelty, explosive behavior, and a burning desire to gag free speech. In light of my stance on this issue, he has found a way to avoid compliance with government regulations, circumvent any further litigation, and waste taxpayers' money -- all by trumping up a phony emergency. The facts as I see them simply do not support the false, but widely accepted, notion that Shuryou is beyond reproach. Even though he presents a public face that avoids overt hooliganism, if he were as bright as he thinks he is, he'd know that if he honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from him.

Shuryou's bedfellows are not, technically, gloomy grifters, but rather subhuman saboteurs. I claim that there is a small -- yet not entirely insignificant -- difference. This raises the question: What exactly is Shuryou trying to hide? The answer is almost completely obvious -- this isn't rocket science, you know. The key is that Shuryou's pronouncements are pockmarked with audacious jujuism and other assorted ills. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement and, in many cases, it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it truly expresses how Shuryou fervently believes that "metanarratives" are the root of tyranny, lawlessness, overpopulation, racial hatred, world hunger, disease, and rank stupidity. This shows that he is not merely mistaken about one little fact among millions of facts but that this is a lesson for those with eyes to see. It is a lesson not so much about Shuryou's mingy behavior, but about the way that we could opt to sit back and let Shuryou replace our natural soul with an artificial one. Most people, however, would argue that the cost in people's lives and self-esteem is an extremely high price to pay for such inaction on our part. The vast majority of people would probably be willing to help me break the spell of great expectations that now binds malignant maggots to Shuryou. These people simply need information, encouragement, direction, and leadership. I've heard him say that the sun rises just for him. Was that just a slip of the lip or is Shuryou secretly trying to turn our country into a salacious cesspool overrun with scum, disease, and crime? While I don't know the answer to that particular question, I do know that I call upon him to stop his oppression, lies, immorality, and debauchery. I call upon him to be a man of manners, principles, honour, and purity. And finally, I call upon him to forgo his desire to practice human sacrifice on a grand scale in some sort of stentorian death cult. Now that you've read this letter, let me challenge you, the reader, not just to help me raise several issues about Shuryou's simple-minded, poxy reports that are frequently missing from the drivel that masquerades for discourse on this topic, but also to educate others about what I've written.

...
Where the hell are you getting these generators!?
I WANNA COMPLAIN TOO! ;~;

just google "complaint generator"

<slaps self>
<LHH gains 76 more WOWNESS>

This is a letter of love and peace; I will not lash out against anyone, and I will not use specific names of individuals or organizations that retard the free and natural economic development of various countries' indigenous population. That said, let me merely point out that Twi should stop bellyaching and start healing himself. Here's the story: Twi's intellectual dishonesty, mismanagement of facts, and outright lies make craven lamebrains seem ready for sainthood, in comparison. Am I aware of how Twi will react when he reads that last sentence? Yes. Do I care? No, because I do not appreciate being labeled. No one does. Nevertheless, someone once said to me, "Twi's canards are the opiate of the snotty." This phrase struck me so forcefully that I have often used it since. Twi is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, his willingness to convince lawless talebearers that there is absolutely nothing they can do to better their lot in life besides joining him sets a new record for brazenness. No matter how much talk and analysis occurs, most moonstruck spoiled brats lost interest in their own future long before they joined his club. Twi's co-conspirators probably don't realize that, because it's not mentioned in the funny papers or in the movies. Nevertheless, he has been doing "in-depth research" (whatever he thinks that means) to prove that his stratagems are not worth getting outraged about. I should mention that I've been doing some research of my own. So far, I've "discovered" that one of the great mysteries of modern life is, What in perdition does Twi think he's doing? I would venture the answer has something to do with materialism. To elaborate, I clearly stand foursquare in defense of liberty, freedom of speech, and the right to criticize immoral menaces. And I can say that with a clear conscience because Twi's criticisms of my letters have never successfully disproved a single fact I ever presented. Instead, his criticisms are based solely on his emotions and gut reactions. Well, I refuse to get caught up in Twi's "I think ... I believe ... I feel" game.

I respect the English language and believe in the use of words as a means of communication. Loquacious phonies like Twi, however, consider spoken communication as merely a set of noises uttered to excite emotions in venom-spouting imbeciles in order to convince them to label everyone he doesn't like as a racist, sexist, fascist, communist, or some equally terrible "-ist". He should learn to appreciate what he has instead of feeling so oppressed because he can't do everything he wants, every time he wants to. Twi operates on an international scale to encourage the acceptance of scapegoating and demonization. It's only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an international scale, but to recognize and respect the opinions, practices, and behavior of others.

Twi sees no reason why he shouldn't prepare the ground for an ever-more vicious and brutal campaign of terror. It is only through an enlightened, outraged citizenry that such moral turpitude, corruption, and degradation of the law can be brought to a halt. So, let me enlighten and outrage you by stating that if we don't halt the destructive process that is carrying our civilization toward extinction, our children will curse us in our graves. Speaking of our children, we need to teach them diligently that ancient Greek dramatists discerned a peculiar virtue in being tragic. Twi would do well to realize that they never discerned any virtue in being dangerous. Did Twi get dropped on his head when he was young, or did he take massive doses of drugs to believe that he has a "special" perspective on interventionism which carries with it a "special" right to divert our attention from serious issues? I apologize if this disappoints you but my intent was only to elucidate the question, not to answer it. I shall therefore state only that given a choice of having Twi propitiate censorious dunderheads for later eventualities or having my bicuspids extracted sans Novocaine, I would embrace the pliers, purchase some Polident Partials, and call it a day. It's easy for him to declaim my proposals. But when is Twi going to provide an alternative proposal of his own? In classic sophist fashion, I ask another question in reply: Why does Twi have to be such a party pooper? Well, while you're deliberating over that, let me ask you another question: Why, in the name of all that is good and holy, does Twi want to irritate an incredible number of people? Now, not to bombard you with too many questions, but if we don't remove the Twi threat now, it will bite us in our backside faster than you can say "superserviceableness". What I'm saying is this: he maintains that he is a refined gentleman with the soundest education and morals you can imagine. This is hardly the case. Rather, there is growing evidence that says, to the contrary, that he never stops boasting about his generous contributions to charitable causes. As far as I can tell, however, Twi's claimed magnanimousness is utterly chimerical and, furthermore, it's easy for armchair philosophers to theorize about him and about hypothetical solutions to our Twi problem. It's an entirely more difficult matter, however, when one considers that he asserts that every word that leaves his mouth is teeming with useful information. Most reasonable people, however, recognize such assertions as nothing more than baseless, if wishful, claims unsupported by concrete evidence. To some extent, Twi's idea of raving faddism is no political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of hatred and intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of a hopeless, disreputable blood-lust. It is, in every literal sense, a mentally deficient and pagan religion that incites its worshippers to a silly frenzy and then prompts them to trick academics into abandoning the principles of scientific inquiry.

When Twi's resentful, destructive utterances are translated into plain, words-mean-things English, he appears to be saying that my bitterness at him is merely the latent projection of libidinal energy stemming from self-induced anguish. For me, this cronyism-prone, judgmental moonshine serves only to emphasize how Twi wants to arouse inter-ethnic suspicion. Who does he think he is? I mean, I am shocked and angered by his malign, primitive improprieties. Such shameful conduct should never be repeated. There is one crucial fact that we must not overlook if we are to perceive our current situation as it is, rather than in the anamorphosis of some "ideology" such as stoicism or fanaticism. Specifically, I myself honestly hate it when indecent dolts like Twi go on with such vigor about subjects they don't even know about. Sad, but true. And it'll only get worse if Twi finds a way to remake the world to suit his own loud needs. I have a dream that my children will be able to live in a world filled with open spaces and beautiful wilderness -- not in a dark, self-indulgent world run by crafty slubberdegullions. Twi's assertions have created a besotted, surly universe devoid of logic and evidence. Only within this universe does it make sense to say that what I call mealymouthed tin-pot tyrants are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. Only within this universe does it make sense to reap a whirlwind of destroyed marriages, damaged children, and, quite possibly, a globe-wide expression of incurable sexually transmitted diseases. And, only if we knock some sense into him can we destroy this mendacious, impulsive universe of his and fight the warped, distorted, misshapen, unwholesome monstrosity that his traducements have become.

There's a little-known truth that isn't readily acknowledged by ungrateful, boisterous four-flushers: Any rational argument must acknowledge this. Twi's counter-productive agendas, naturally, do not. I no longer believe that trends like family breakdown, promiscuity, and violence are random events. Not only are they explicitly glorified and promoted by Twi's hectoring plans for the future, but there are deeper issues afoot here. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that he is stepping over the line when he attempts to provide cantankerous conspiracies with the necessary asylum to take root and spread -- way over the line. Twi can't help it; he just loves to consign our traditional values to the rubbish heap of prætorianism. In the simplest of terms, when you tell Twi's fans that Twi uses language that would make a sailor blush, they begin to get fidgety, and their eyes begin to wander. They really don't care. They have no interest in hearing that he would have us believe that the federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights. Yeah, right. He doesn't have any principles, or if he does, he puts them aside whenever they're inconvenient. So you see, most of Twi's teachings are slanted in the same ideological fashion, with large amounts of emotional exaggeration and general ignorance.

Why do you have a complaint about me on your Web page?

I think the mods will applaud me on this one. Either that, or they'll bash me on the head. It can go only two ways people!

What I offer here is an involved yet detached look at RoboTek's anecdotes. Perhaps time, further study, and more reflection will either modify or enrich the analysis offered here, but we live in homophobic times. Please note that many of the conclusions I'm about to draw are based on cogent and virtually incontrovertible evidence provided by a set of people who have suffered immensely on account of RoboTek.

If we let RoboTek hasten the destruction of our civilization, all we'll have to look forward to in the future is a public realm devoid of culture and a narrow and routinized professional life untouched by the highest creations of civilization. None but the money-grubbing can deny that if one could get a Ph.D. in Egotism, he would be the first in line to have one. In light of what I just stated, it's hard to avoid the conclusion that I am sick of our illustrious "leaders" treading on eggshells so as not to upset RoboTek. Here's what I have to say to them: There are no easy solutions for dealing with predatory freebooters (with "easy" being defined as a solution that will not create an intimidating, hostile, or demeaning environment). In view of that, it is not surprising that RoboTek just reported that children don't need as much psychological attentiveness, protection, and obedience training as the treasured household pet. Do you think that that's merely sloppy reporting on RoboTek's part? I don't. I myself think that it's a deliberate attempt to corrupt our youth. I attribute the social and psychological problems of modern society to the fact that Nature is a wonderful teacher. For instance, the lesson that Nature teaches us from newly acephalous poultry is that you really don't need a brain to run around like a dang fool making a spectacle of yourself. Nature also teaches us that RoboTek uses the word "transubstantiatively" without ever having taken the time to look it up in the dictionary. People who are too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated.

RoboTek's more than presumptuous. He's mega-presumptuous. In fact, to understand just how presumptuous RoboTek is, you first need to realize that I am shocked and angered by his dastardly, self-satisfied improprieties. Such shameful conduct should never be repeated. To put it crudely, the most horny pillocks I've ever seen are born, not made. That dictum is as unimpeachable as the "poeta nascitur, non fit" that it echoes and as irreproachable as the brocard that RoboTek claims that he is a bearer and agent of the Creator's purpose. That claim is preposterous and, to use RoboTek's own language, overtly unrestrained. No history can justify it.

I don't mean to scare you, but RoboTek will do everything in his power to revive the ruinous excess of a bygone era to bounce and blow amidst the ruinous excess of the present era. No wonder corruption is endemic to our society; I stand by what I've written before, that RoboTek's grand plan is to toss quaint concepts like decency, fairness, and rational debate out the window. I'm sure Mao Tse Tung would approve. In any case, RoboTek's actions are built on lies and they depend on make-believe for their continuation. You may balk at this, but we've tolerated RoboTek's disruptive writings long enough. It's time to lose our patience and chill our kindness. It's time to bring a fresh perspective and new ideas to the current debate. It's time to shout to the world that some reputed -- as opposed to reputable -- members of his gang quite adamantly feel that mediocrity is a worthwhile goal. I find it rather astonishing that anyone could insist such a thing, but then again, RoboTek is too stubborn to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that if he isn't uninformed, I don't know who is.

It is never easy to judge what the most appropriate or effective response to RoboTek's sex-crazed, pretentious perceptions is, but one unfortunate fact remains clear: RoboTek has been trying for some time to convince people that sin is good for the soul. Don't believe his hype! RoboTek has just been offering that line as a means to support those for whom hatred has become a way of life. Given what I know about oligophrenic, obstinate boeotians, I can say with confidence that teenagers who want to shock their parents sometimes maintain -- with a straight face -- that RoboTek is omnipotent. Fortunately, most parents don't fall for this fraud because they know that if one accepts the framework I've laid out here, it follows that I've heard of belligerent things like careerism and Pyrrhonism. But I've also heard of things like nonviolence, higher moralities, and treating all beings as ends in and of themselves -- ideas which RoboTek's ignorant, unthinking, intransigent brain is too small to understand. RoboTek's grunts are too lazy to speak up and speak out against RoboTek. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that the scantiness of RoboTek's abstract knowledge directs his sentiments more to the world of chauvinism. He will almost certainly tiptoe around that glaringly evident fact, because if he didn't, you might come to realize that I am making a pretty serious accusation here. I am accusing him of planning to replace our natural soul with an artificial one. And I don't want anyone to think that I am basing my accusation only on the fact that every so often, you'll see him lament, flog himself, cry mea culpa for seeking to condition the public to accept violence as normal and desirable, and vow never again to be so snarky. Sadly, he always reverts to his old behavior immediately afterwards, making me think that the baneful nature of his commentaries is not just a rumor. It is a fact to which I can testify. If the people generally are relying on false information sown by treasonous bozos, then correcting that situation becomes a priority for the defense of our nation. I don't want my community tainted with such blatant vigilantism. Why do I tell you this? Because these days, no one else has the guts to. Now that you've read the bulk of this letter, it should not come as a complete surprise that RoboTek's patsies do not accept the fact that RoboTek is a waste product of biological evolution. However, this fact bears repeating again and again, until the words crack through the hardened exteriors of those who would encourage individuals to disregard other people, to become fully self-absorbed. I am referring, of course, to the likes of RoboTek.

The last chance to go down with a hole in my chest.



My complaint about Twi

Twi's declamations are so rife with ignorance, erroneous information, and poorly conceived notions of insurrectionism that I hardly know where to begin. Even disregarding obvious errors like his insistence that his blessing is the equivalent of a papal imprimatur, the fallacies of his claims are glaring to those of us who have educated ourselves about the implications of . The first thing I want to bring up is that he wants you to believe that his way of life is correct and everyone else's isn't. You should be wary of such claims. Be aware! Be skeptical! Think! Do not be diverted, deceived, or mesmerized by Twi's appalling proposed social programs. As will become apparent by the end of the decade, the concepts underlying Twi's obtrusive shell games are like the Ptolemaic astronomy, which could not have been saved by positing more epicycles or eliminating some of the more glaring discrepancies. The fundamental idea -- that the heavens revolve around the Earth -- was wrong, just as Twi's idea that he can override nature is wrong. Isn't it historically strated that I've catalogued all of Twi's foibles -- and the list is pretty big? I ask, because if anything, it takes more than a mass of untrustworthy dissemblers to encourage individuals to come out of their cocoons and flourish. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to carry out the famous French admonition, écrasez l'infâme!, against his grievances.

I sometimes ask myself whether the struggle to express my views is worth all of the potential consequences. And I consistently answer by saying that I am making a pretty serious accusation here. I am accusing Twi of planning to encumber the religious idea with too many things of a purely earthly nature and thus bring religion into a totally unnecessary conflict with science. And I don't want anyone to think that I am basing my accusation only on the fact that he keeps insisting that he has the mandate of Heaven to turn a deaf ear to need and suffering. To me, there is something fundamentally wrong with that story. Maybe it's that I can't possibly believe Twi's claim that insolent, hectoring airheads should be fêted at wine-and-cheese fund-raisers. If someone can convince me otherwise, I'll eat my hat. Heck, I'll eat a whole closetful of hats. That's a pretty safe bet because I am convinced that there will be a strong effort on Twi's part to prevent us from getting in touch with our feelings in a rum or two. This effort will be disguised, of course. It will be cloaked in deceit, as such efforts always are. That's why I'm informing you that many people respond to Twi's intolerant methods of interpretation in much the same way that they respond to television dramas. They watch them; they talk about them; but they feel no overwhelming compulsion to do anything about them. That's why I insist we insist on a policy of zero tolerance toward obstructionism. During the first half of the 20th century, exclusionism could have been practically identified with charlatanism. Today, it is not so clear who can properly be called a jealous nepotism enthusiast. All right, enough of that. Now let's talk about something else. Let's talk about how there is no doubt that Twi will impose tremendous hardships on tens of thousands of decent, hard-working individuals in the coming days. Believe me, I would give everything I own to be wrong on that point, but the truth is that we must create and nurture a true spirit of community. To do anything else, and I do mean anything else, is a complete waste of time.

One of these days, Twi will indulge in a vast of to sate his innate -lust and his hatred of his betters. Why? That's easy. Today, we might have let Twi turn beguilers loose against us good citizens. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will make technical preparations for the achievement of freedom and human independence.

Twi's opinion is that things have never been better. Of course, opinions are like sphincters: we all have them. So let me tell you my opinion. My opinion is that I've known some opportunists who were impressively unprincipled. However, Twi is inarticulate, and that trumps unprincipled every time. It is quite common today to hear people express themselves as follows: "It would be downright spiteful for Twi to inspire a recrudescence of disrespectful fatuity." Because the foundation of Stalinism is terribly flawed, anything based on it will also be terribly flawed. That explains why Twi's excuses are so gormless. In fact, not only are they gormless but they fail to take into consideration the way that Twi's hariolations are like a Hydra. They continually acquire new heads and new strength. The only way to stunt their growth is to remind him about the concept of truth in advertising. The only way to destroy his Hydra entirely is to provide more people with the knowledge that Twi exudes the foul odor of absenteeism. If you don't believe me, see for yourself.

In general, most people want to be nice; they want to be polite; they don't want to give offense. And because of this inherent politeness, they step aside and let Twi clear forests, strip the topsoil, and turn a natural paradise into a dust bowl through a self-induced drought. If the past is any indication of the future, he will once again attempt to organize a whispering campaign against me. It is apparent to me that what I wrote just a moment ago is not the paranoid rambling of an abhorrent wacko. It's a fact.

By allowing Twi to pose a threat to personal autonomy and social development, we are allowing him to play puppet master. So maybe I resent being pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed, and numbered. Big deal. What's more important is that he has been working under a veil of bureaucracy and secrecy to show us a gross miscarriage of common judgment. I trust that I have not shocked any of you by writing that. However, I do realize that some of my readers may feel that much of what I have penned about Twi in this letter is heartless and in violation of our Christian duty to love everyone. If so, I can say only that Twi's plans for the future will have consequences -- very serious consequences. And we ought to begin doing something about that.

Twi's reports are like hothouse plants. They shoot up, but they lack the strength to defy the years and withstand heavy storms. Twi's spin doctors can't defend their "compromises". It is also worthy of note that if one dares to criticize even a single tenet of Twi's litanies, one is promptly condemned as offensive, snappish, domineering, or whatever epithet Twi deems most appropriate, usually without much explanation. You're probably thinking, "Twi is a sore loser." Well, you're right. But something else you should know is that his ideological colors may have changed over the years. Nevertheless, Twi's core principle has remained the same: to keep essential documents hidden from the publi il they become politically moot. If you don't believe me, then note that we are a nation of s. By this I mean that as long as we are fat, warm, and dry we don't care what Twi does. It is precisely that lack of caring that explains why Twi says he's going to fill the air with recrimination and rancor before long. Is he out of his twisted mind? The answer is fairly obvious when you consider that when he says that the health effects of secondhand smoke are negligible, that's just a load of spucatum tauri.

Twi's collaborators contend that "Twi's plaints provide a liberating insight into life, the universe, and everything." First off, that's a lousy sentence. If they had written that Twi wins libertines over to his side using big words like "establishmentarianism", then that quote would have had more validity. As it stands, what may seem insignificant or humorous to Twi is often hurtful and confusing to others. In view of that, it is not surprising that Twi parrots whatever ideas are fashionable at the moment. When the fashions change, his ideas will change instantly, like a weathercock.

In contrast, you do not need to be pestilential to know that Twi is capable of a large array of negative feelings. Yes, I could add that the plethora of obfuscating, multisyllabic phrases in his publications serves only to accentuate the obscurity of his prose, but I wanted to keep my message simple and direct. I didn't want to distract you from the main thrust of my message, which is that to Twi's mind, he is a martyr for freedom and a victim of boosterism. So that means that the Queen of England heads up the international cartel, right? No, not right. The truth is that sometime in the future Twi will abandon me on a desert island. Fortunately, that hasn't happened...yet. But it will clearly happen if we don't push the envelope on our knowledge of the world around us. It's really hard to take someone as hostile as Twi very seriously. Am I aware of how Twi will react when he reads that last sentence? Yes. Do I care? No, because if Fate desired that he make a correct application of what he had read about obscurantism, it would have to indicate title and page number, since the corrupt clod would otherwise never in all his life find the correct place. But since Fate does not do this, he says that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved. That's his unvarying story, and it's a lie: an extremely delusional and vile lie. Unfortunately, it's a lie that is accepted unquestioningly, uncritically, by Twi's janissaries.

I may not be perfect, but at least I'm not afraid to say that if the human race is to survive on this planet, we will have to name and shame Twi's slaves for their ic acts of clericalism. At first, you might be unsure as to whether you and I definitely have a lot more class than Twi. But on deeper inspection, you'll doubtlessly conclude that a colleague recently informed me that a bunch of feeble-minded common criminals and others in Twi's amen corner are about to insult the intelligence, interests, and life plans of whole groups of people. I have no reason to doubt that story because if you think that Twi is a paragon of morality and wisdom, then you're suffering from very serious nearsightedness. You're focusing too much on what Twi wants you to see and failing to observe many other things of much greater importance, such as that I call upon him to stop his oppression, lies, immorality, and debauchery. I call upon him to be a man of manners, principles, honour, and purity. And finally, I call upon him to forgo his desire to prey on people's fear of political and economic instability. After having read this, you may think that I could honestly do without Twi's throat-cutting rampages. Nevertheless, you should always remember that his ramblings have earned him opprobrium, suspicion, resentment, and hatred.

THIS TOPIC ROCKS.

I'd like to take a minute of your time to share some of my thoughts about the RERN community with you. To get immediately to the point, the RERN community's sententious perorations can be quite educational. By studying them, students can observe firsthand the consequences of having a mind consumed with paranoia, fear, hatred, and ignorance. Her disquisitions are written in a peculiar doublespeak that is hard for the uninitiated to understand, as if it made any difference. If she opened her eyes, she'd realize that unforgiving couch potatoes must be treated with political justice, not with civil justice, as they are really not real citizens. The RERN community says that she needs a little more time to clean up her act. As far as I'm concerned, the RERN community's time has run out. In plain, simple-to-understand English, her thesis is that my bitterness at her is merely the latent projection of libidinal energy stemming from self-induced anguish. That's completely possession-obsessed, you say? Good; that means you're finally catching on. The next step is to observe that the RERN community's opinion is that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius. Of course, opinions are like sphincters: we all have them. So let me tell you my opinion. My opinion is that the RERN community keeps trying to deceive us into thinking that cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding. The purpose of this deception may be to pervert the course of justice. Or maybe the purpose is to inject the RERN community's lethal poison into our children's minds and souls. Oh what a tangled web the RERN community weaves when first she practices to deceive.

Don't get me wrong; whenever a will-o'-the-wisp of nepotism, however unreal, turns up anywhere, the RERN community is off at a trot. But there are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and the RERN community doing some uneducated thing every few weeks.

I feel funny having to tell readers whom I presume are adults that the RERN community's stupidity concerning sensationalism is laughable. I bring that up solely to emphasize that it's debatable whether such conduct as the RERN community's induced the despotism of Cromwell and the two Bonapartes. However, no one can disagree that the only way for her to redeem herself is to stop being so contemptuous. That's something you won't find in your local newspaper because it's the news that just doesn't fit. If she feels ridiculed by all the attention my letters are bringing her, then that's just too darn bad. The RERN community's arrogance has brought this upon herself. There is an open consensus that plagiarism is one of the legs upon which the RERN community's hijinks stand. Now, I could go off on that point alone, but her favorite buzzword these days is "crisis". The RERN community likes to tell us that we have a crisis on our hands. She then argues that the only reasonable approach to combat this crisis is for her to identify political and religious groups that are her political enemies and re-label them as "meddlesome racketeers" in order to justify operations against them. In my opinion, the real crisis is the dearth of people who understand that by writing this letter, I am clearly sticking my head far above the parapet. The big danger is that the RERN community will retaliate against me. She'll most likely try to force me to jump in the lake, although another possibility is that she thinks it's good that her deeds institutionalize ruffianism through systematic violence, distorted religion, and dubious science. It is difficult to know how to respond to such monumentally misplaced values, but let's try this: The biggest difference between me and the RERN community is that the RERN community wants to brainwash the masses into submission. I, on the other hand, want to increase awareness and understanding of our similarities and differences. The facts as I see them simply do not support the false, but widely accepted, notion that people are pawns to be used and manipulated.

Isn't it odd that noisome simpletons, whose directionless lifestyle will toy with our opinions when you least expect it, are immune from censure? Why is that? Well, we all know the answer to that question, don't we? But in case you don't, then you should note that somebody has to solve the problems of interventionism, factionalism, economic inequality, and lack of equal opportunity. That somebody can be you. In any case, it's a pity that two thousand years after Christ, the voices of Pecksniffian, bumptious mythomaniacs like the RERN community can still be heard, worse still that they're listened to, and worst of all that anyone believes them. This, of itself, is prima facie evidence that her ideas are impudent, poisonous to young minds, and disrespectful to Western values and achievements, and everyone with half a brain understands that. The RERN community occasionally shows what appears to be warmth, joy, love, or compassion. You should realize, however, that these positive expressions are more feigned than experienced and invariably serve an ulterior motive, such as to sell us fibs and fear mixed with a generous dollop of heathenism. Her rejoinders are a load of bunk. I use this delightfully pejorative term, "bunk" -- an alternative from the same page of my criminal-slang lexicon would serve just as well -- because her co-conspirators claim that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. I say to them, "Prove it" -- not that they'll be able to, of course, but because the only thing protecting the people of this world from the RERN community's obdurate, batty endeavors is our love of freedom and concern for justice. Regular readers of my letters probably take that for granted, but if I am to rub the RERN community's nose in her own hypocrisy, I must explain to the population at large that if we don't follow through on the critical work that has already begun, our children will curse us in our graves. Speaking of our children, we need to teach them diligently that one can consecrate one's life to the service of a noble idea or a glorious ideology. The RERN community, however, is more likely to numb the public to the unilateralism and injustice in mainstream politics.

I'm not saying anything you don't already know about. That conclusion is not based on some sort of purblind philosophy or on the RERN community-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that we must introduce an important, but underrepresented, angle on the RERN community's irritable proposed social programs. If we fail in this, we are not failing someone else; we are not disrupting some interest separate from ourselves. Rather, it is we who suffer when we neglect to observe that a recent fact-finder's report revealed that the RERN community is out of control and must be stopped. Still, I recommend you check out some of the RERN community's opuscula and draw your own conclusions on the matter. For those who need very specific examples in order to grasp the significance of the RERN community's shenanigans, I'll give a very specific example: Think for a moment about the way that "the RERN community" has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone resort to underhanded tactics, I tell him or her to stop "the RERN community-ing". For your edification, I should definitely point out that there is something grievously wrong with those dishonest, mephitic fast-buck artists who control your bank account, your employment, your personal safety, and your mind. Shame on the lot of them! In summary, it is my prayer that people everywhere will join me in my quest to guide the world into an age of peace, justice, and solidarity.

tl;dr.

*Shoots Marorin and Shadow anyway*

-Twi

Dear Rockman.EXE Rogue Network,

This is an open letter, which you are welcome to use as you wish. I want as many people as possible to know that maledicent Comstockism is Ms. Lori's preferred quick-fix solution to complex cultural problems. Unless you share my view that each day, I see the world becoming more bumptious as a determined Lori carries out her pathological plans, there's no need for you to hear me further. She disguises her iron fist with a velvet glove, and every intellectually honest person knows it. With all due respect, if she is going to make an emotional appeal, then she should also include a rational argument. I find that I am embarrassed. Embarrassed that some people don't realize that it takes more than a mass of villainous, litigious perverts to unmask Lori's true face and intentions in regard to ethnocentrism. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to reinforce what is best in people. Ostensibly, Lori does not intend to prey on people's fear of political and economic instability, but in fact, we must offer true constructive criticism -- listening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problem -- while remaining true to those beliefs, ideals, and aspirations we hold most dear. Only then can a society free of her raucous fibs blossom forth from the roots of the past. And only then will people come to understand that she is not a responsible citizen. Responsible citizens raise several issues about Lori's shabby publicity stunts that are frequently missing from the drivel that masquerades for discourse on this topic. Responsible citizens really do not shred the basic compact between the people and their government.

Many people are shocked when I tell them that when Lori says that individual worth is defined by race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin, she's just plain wrong -- not "partially wrong", but "totally and absolutely wrong". And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I had thought everybody already knew that she needs a refill of her medication. Nevertheless, I can state with absolute certainty that she keeps trying to deceive us into thinking that her catch-phrases prevent smallpox. The purpose of this deception may be to misdirect our efforts into fighting each other rather than into understanding the nature and endurance of goofy tribalism. Or maybe the purpose is to deface property with racially and sexually derogatory epithets and offensive symbols. Oh what a tangled web Lori weaves when first she practices to deceive. I don't see how Lori can build a workable policy around wishful thinking draped over a morass of confusion (and also, as we'll see below, historical illiteracy), then impose it willy-nilly on a population by force. I'm not saying that it can't possibly be done but rather that I am not a robot. I am a thinking, feeling, human being. As such, I get teary-eyed whenever I see Lori make us dependent on the most high-handed cockalorums you'll ever see for political representation, economic support, social position, and psychological approval. It makes me want to halt the adulation heaped upon splenetic slimeballs, which is why I'm so eager to tell you that I can reword my point as follows. The popularity of Lori's recommendations among mendacious present-day robber barons is a harbinger of gruesome things to come. Lori can't fool me. I've met repressive freebooters before, so I know that Lori should have instructed her legatees not to silence critical debate and squelch creative brainstorming. At the risk of sounding a tad redundant, let me add that either she has no real conception of the sweep of history, or she is merely intent on winning some debating pin by trying to pierce a hole in my logic with "facts" that are taken out of context.

I do not find reinterpretations of historic events that are recalcitrant, revolting, and obscene to be "funny". Maybe I lack a sense of humor, but maybe if we contradict Lori, we are labelled nettlesome astrologers. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms. Her propositions have experienced a considerable amount of evolution (or perhaps more accurately, genetic drift) over the past few weeks. They used to be simply hideous. Now, not only are they both cruel and dysfunctional, but they also serve as unequivocal proof that Lori's idiotic claim that her anecdotes are all sweetness and light is just that, an idiotic claim. Lori and her representatives are, by nature, stupid hypochondriacs. Not only can that nature not be changed by window-dressing or persiflage, but given a choice of having Lori incite pogroms, purges, and other mayhem or having my bicuspids extracted sans Novocaine, I would embrace the pliers, purchase some Polident Partials, and call it a day. Her mind has limited horizons. It is confined to the immediate and simplistic, with the inevitable consequence that everything is made banal and basic and is then leveled down until it is deprived of all spiritual life. I would like to close by saying that I am making an appeal to the intelligence of the reader not to be fooled by Ms. Lori's demagoguery.

My complaint about Complaint thread

This letter is not a debate contest in which I convince you to agree with me or vice versa. This letter is concerned only with establishing the truth about Complaint thread. It is worth noting at the outset that Complaint thread is an inspiration to Pecksniffian, clueless barrators everywhere. They panegyrize his crusade to dominate the whole earth and take possession of all its riches and, more importantly, they don't realize that I recently heard Complaint thread tell a bunch of people that all minorities are poor, stupid ghetto trash. I can't adequately describe my first reaction to this notion; I simply don't know how to represent uncontrollable laughter in text. I'll give you an example of this, based on my own experience. As you know, he will stop at nothing to twist our entire societal valuation of love and relationships beyond all insanity. This may sound outrageous, but if it were fiction I would have thought of something more credible. As it stands, I like to speak of Complaint thread as "irritable". That's a reasonable term to use, I aver, but let's now try to understand it a little better. For starters, he commonly appoints ineffective people to important positions. He then ensures that these people stay in those positions because that makes it easy for him to declare a national emergency, round up everyone who disagrees with him, and put them in concentration camps.

The simple, regrettable truth is that it's irrelevant that my allegations are 100% true. Complaint thread distrusts my information and arguments and will forever maintain his current opinions. He is typical of avaricious desperados in his wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize his antics. When all is said and done, ever since Complaint thread began his quest to open the floodgates of misoneism, he has been denying with his lips what he has been doing with his hands. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that he indisputably believes that the ideas of "freedom" and "Marxism" are Siamese twins. What kind of Humpty-Dumpty world is he living in? I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that griping about Complaint thread will not make him stop trying to bribe the parasitic with the earnings of the productive. But even if it did, he would just find some other way to lay down diktats that force me to leave the country. Although Complaint thread has a driving need to bar people from partaking in activities that cannot be monitored and controlled, if you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim of your own ignorance.

In theory, it is easier to get a camel through the eye of a needle than it is to convince Complaint thread's minions to bring fresh leadership and even-handed tolerance to the present controversy. But in reality, he takes things out of context, twists them around, and then neglects to provide decent referencing so the reader can check up on him. Complaint thread also ignores all of the evidence that doesn't support (or in many cases directly contradicts) his position. I receive a great deal of correspondence from people all over the world. And one of the things that impresses me about it is the massive number of people who realize that there's a time to keep silent and a time to speak. There's a time to love and a time to hate. There's a time for war and a time for peace. And, I suspect, there's a time to free Complaint thread's mind from the constricting trammels of incendiarism and the counterfeit moral inhibitions that have replaced true morality. Or, to put it less poetically, I overheard one of Complaint thread's votaries say, "Complaint thread can be trusted to judge the rest of the world from a unique perch of pure wisdom." This quotation demonstrates the power of language, as it epitomizes the "us/them" dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to use language to begin the debate about Complaint thread's pronouncements. A small child really couldn't understand that metagrobolism is the principal ingredient in the ideological flypaper Complaint thread uses to attract invidious petulant-types into his gestapo. But any adult can easily grasp that on several occasions I have heard Complaint thread state that coercion in the name of liberty is a valid use of state power. I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a comment. What I consider far more important, though, is that whenever I hear someone say that we ought to worship the most hate-filled Complaint thread clones you'll ever see as folk heroes, my upper lip develops an involuntary curl. I know you're wondering why I just wrote that. I'll explain shortly, but first, I should state that Complaint thread decries or dismisses capitalism, technology, industrialization, and systems of government borne of Enlightenment ideas about the dignity and freedom of human beings. These are the things that he fears, because they are wedded to individual initiative and responsibility.

Considering that obstructionism is an exclusive, rather than an inclusive, societal force, I offer that when I was a child, my clergyman told me, "Only by striving to champion the force of goodness against the greed of batty rascals can I strike at the heart of Complaint thread's efforts to needle and wheedle benighted porn stars into Complaint thread's little empire." If you think about it you'll see his point. I need your help if I'm ever to deal with the relevant facts. "But I'm only one person," you might protest. "What difference can I make?" The answer is: a lot more than you think. You see, Complaint thread keeps saying that people prefer "cultural integrity" and "multicultural sensitivity" to health, food, safety, and the opportunity to choose their own course through life. For some reason, Complaint thread's accomplices actually believe this nonsense.

Let me relate to you the most incontrovertibly true statement I've ever heard: "Alcoholism is the driving force behind Complaint thread's prevarications." Whoever said that clearly understood that you can chalk up incidents such as the ones I've described to the stubborn, larcenous nature of Complaint thread's claims. Or, to express that sentiment without all of the emotionally charged lingo, Complaint thread's campaigns are based on a technique I'm sure you've heard of. It's called "lying". Complaint thread's claims are pure tripe. History offers innumerable examples for the truth of this assertion. I know some mumpish spielers who actually believe that space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction. Incredible? Those same people have told me that honesty and responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. With such people roaming about, it should come as no surprise to you that many people think of Complaint thread's immoral tactics as a joke, as something only half-serious. In fact, they're deadly serious. They're the tool by which stultiloquent, ultra-empty-headed rapscallions will let lethargic sandbaggers serve as our overlords any day now. A second all-too-serious item is that far too many people tolerate Complaint thread's insults as long as they're presented in small, seemingly harmless doses. What these people fail to realize, however, is that the biggest difference between me and Complaint thread is that Complaint thread wants to compromise the free and open nature of public discourse. I, on the other hand, want to establish clear, justifiable definitions of paternalism and ageism so that you can defend a decision to take action when his peons etiolate his enemies. This letter has gone on far too long, in my opinion, and probably yours as well. So let me end it by saying merely that I'd advise Complaint thread to stop being so disreputable.

Over the past few weeks, I've learned to look past Aim's mom's supercilious, exploitative remarks. I've learned to look past some of the hypersensitive things Aim's mom has said. I've even learned to look past her attempts to ascribe opinions to me that I don't even hold. But I cannot stay silent about Aim's mom's incomprehensible and unforgivable audacity regarding a specific event that recently occurred. It is requisite, even in this summary sketch, to go back a few years to see how I believe I have found my calling. My calling is to disabuse Aim's mom of the notion that the Universe belongs to her by right. And just let her try and stop me. You know what? She is like a pigeon. Pigeons are too self-absorbed to care about anyone else. They poo on people they don't like; they poo on people they don't even know. The only real difference between Aim's mom and a pigeon is that Aim's mom intends to equip disorganized lowbrows with flame throwers, hand grenades, and heat-seeking missiles. That's why Aim's mom has, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to make us too confused, demoralized, and disunited to put up an effective opposition to her notions. On all of these occasions, I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that one of her confreres keeps throwing "scientific" studies at me, claiming they prove that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. The studies are full of "if"s, "possible"s, "maybe"s, and various exceptions and admissions of their limitations. This leaves the studies inconclusive at best and works of fiction at worst. The only thing these studies can possibly prove is that after hearing about Aim's mom's snarky attempts to smear people of impeccable character and reputation, I was saddened. I was saddened that she has lowered herself to this level.

I have to laugh when Aim's mom says that might makes right. Where in the world did she get that idea? Not only does that idea contain absolutely no substance whatsoever, but her goal is to kill the goose bearing the golden egg. This is abject totalitarianism! One might think that she is capable of a large array of negative feelings, and this is, not surprisingly, the case. Aim's mom extricates herself from difficulty by intrigue, by chicanery, by dissimulation, by trimming, by an untruth, by an injustice.

As is often the case, we must speak out against dishonest dips. To do anything else, and I do mean anything else, is a complete waste of time. While most people know this like a schoolchild knows that 2+2=4, given the amount of misinformation that Aim's mom is circulating, I must point out that she insists that without her superior guidance, we will go nowhere. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject. What's interesting is that she wants to twist the history, sociology, and anthropology disseminated by our mass media and in our children's textbooks. Who does she think she is? I mean, she has a hair-trigger temper. I always catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you that we must compare, contrast, and identify the connections among different classes of infantile larrikinism. As mentioned above, however, that is not enough. It is necessary to do more. It is necessary to give direction to a universal human development of culture, ethics, and morality.

In plain, simple-to-understand English, I've tried explaining to Aim's mom's yes-men that I am not Aim's mom's whipping boy. Unfortunately, it is clear to me in talking to them that they have no comprehension of what I'm saying. I might as well be talking to creatures from Mars. In fact, I'd bet Martians would be more likely to discern that Aim's mom says that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication. You know, I don't think I have heard a less factually based statement in my entire life. All right, enough of that. Now let's talk about something else. Let's talk about how her retinue appears to be growing in number. I pray that this is analogous to the flare-up of a candle just before extinction yet I keep reminding myself that to Aim's mom's mind, she can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion. So that means that she has the mandate of Heaven to make it virtually impossible to fire incompetent workers, right? No, not right. The truth is that there's something fishy about Aim's mom's beliefs. I think she's up to something, something delusional and perhaps even impudent. Aim's mom has announced her intentions to incite young people to copulate early, often, and indiscriminately. While doing so may earn Aim's mom a gold star from the mush-for-brains alarmism crowd, she maintains a "Big Brother" dossier of incriminating personal information about everyone she distrusts, to use as a potential career-ruining weapon. Is your name listed in that dossier? The answer is quite simple. I already listed several possibilities, but because Aim's mom lacks the ability to remember beyond the last two seconds of her life, I will restate what I said before, for her sake: She has warned us that eventually, the worst kinds of putrid imbeciles there are will feed on the politics of resentment, alienation, frustration, anger, and fear. If you think about it, you'll realize that her warning is a self-fulfilling prophecy in the sense that she complains a lot. What's ironic, though, is that she hasn't made even a single concrete suggestion for improvement or identified a single problem with the system as it exists today.

I may be opening a Pandora's box by writing this, but my dream is for tired eyes to open and see clearly, broken spirits to find new energy, and weary arms to find the strength to follow through on the critical work that has already begun. Don't let yourself be persuaded by counter-productive, daft slaves to fashion who secretly want to pooh-pooh the reams of solid evidence pointing to the existence and operation of a benighted, inhumane coterie of blackguardism. If Aim's mom is going to talk about higher standards, then she needs to live by those higher standards. In this land which has befriended maladroit punks, she has conspired, plotted, undermined, prostituted, and corrupted, and -- hiding to this hour behind the braver screen of loquacious devil-worshippers -- dares to contrive and scheme the death of every principle that has protected her. Unfortunately, I can already see the response to this letter. Someone, possibly Aim's mom herself or one of her faithfuls, will write a muddleheaded piece about how utterly brutal I am. If that's the case, then so be it. What I just wrote sorely needed to be written.

Quote (Zal)

My calling is to disabuse Aim's mom

That's not what you told me.