Posts made by Strikeman

For some reason, it reminds me of Gantz...

Fairly good...you must've spent some time on this.

You've had that since I died a couple of months ago.

4/10

Riddle 1: I know this is some from novel or something...but death?

Riddle 2: Dirt?

Wowness?

I just had to come back from the dead to post.

Can we focus on the more postive aspects of Higurashi?

Mr. Rogers is epic, Fox. Period.

Very.

VERY EPIC.

I was laughing so hard when they said explained what LOL means...Christ, that video was funny.

And about the stadium bombings, Fox? That was just one crazy guy...give poor Anon a break.

My ears...ow..

That is one of the most epic lines ever.

Then maybe you should get some RAM/virtual memory so it DOESN'T crash in the first place.

I was kind of mad about Moody dying..he had the best line in that series.

CONSTANT VILIGANCE!!!

BOOO!! BAD DRAWING 10/10

What do you got against Anon?

Anyway, sorry, but I respect Ender's Game..no Wiggin incest for me.

THIS PRODUCT HAS BEEN BRANDED WITH THE MARK OF UGLY

I'd like to take a minute of your time to share some of my thoughts about Zanallen with you. One of my objectives is to provide some balance to Zanallen's one-sided grievances and encourage others to do the same. While there is no evidence that we can't afford to be so piteous in such difficult times, it is clear that if we let him deprive individuals of the right to operate on today's real -- not tomorrow's ideal -- political terrain, then greed, corruption, and plagiarism will characterize the government. Oppressive measures will be directed against citizens. And lies and deceit will be the stock-in-trade of the media and educational institutions. This is not to say that his weltanschauung is that he is forward-looking, open-minded, and creative. It is merely to point out that his personal attacks are rife with contradictions and difficulties; they're completely vengeful, meet no objective criteria, and are unsuited for a supposedly educated population. And as if that weren't enough, his provocateurs often reverse the normal process of interpretation. That is, they value the unsaid over the said, the obscure over the clear.

Are Zanallen's reinterpretations of historic events good for the country? The nation's suicide statistics, drug statistics, crime statistics, divorce statistics, and mental illness statistics give us part of the answer. These statistics should make it clear that my cause is to work together towards a shared vision. I call upon men and women from all walks of life to support my cause with their life-affirming eloquence and indomitable spirit of human decency and moral righteousness. Only then will the whole world realize that when I say that I am fed up with Zanallen's malignant and phlegmatic behavior, this does not, I repeat, does not mean that he could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else. This is a common fallacy held by unscrupulous rumormongers.

This state of affairs demands the direct assault on those Pecksniffian roorbacks that seek to traduce and discredit everyone but the worst classes of neurotic personæ non gratæ there are. Zanallen shouldn't create a world sunk in the most abject superstition, fanaticism, and ignorance. That would be like asking a question at a news conference and, too angry and passionate to wait for the answer, exiting the auditorium before the response. Both of those actions reduce human beings to the status of domestic animals.

In other words, it would be wrong to imply that Zanallen is involved in some kind of conspiracy to divert us from proclaiming what in our innermost conviction is absolutely necessary. It would be wrong because his propositions are far beyond the conspiracy stage. Not only that, but his crazy game of chess -- the unregenerate chess of solipsism -- has continued for far too long. It's time to checkmate this disruptive galoot and show him that if he were paying attention -- which it would seem he is not, as I've already gone over this -- he'd see that what he is doing is not an innocent, recreational sort of thing. It is a criminal activity, it is an immoral activity, it is a socially destructive activity, and it is a profoundly worthless activity. Those of you who thought that Zanallen was finally going to leave us alone are in for a big surprise, because Zanallen recently announced his plans to expand, augment, and intensify the size and intrusiveness of his coalition. Do his representatives act against injustice, whether it concerns drunk driving, domestic violence, or even Trotskyism? No, that would be the correct and logical thing to do. Instead, they turn fast-buck artists loose against us good citizens.

It's possible that Zanallen doesn't realize this because he has been ingrained with so much of nonrepresentationalism's propaganda. If that's the case, I recommend that we shoo him away like the annoying bug that he is. Maybe it's just me, but don't you think that he is nuttier than squirrel dung? He is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, Zanallen's willingness to spam the Internet with unsolicited unpatriotic, scornful junk e-mail sets a new record for brazenness.

Do you really think that his debauches are the result of a high-minded urge to do sociological research, as Zanallen claims? Wake up! Zanallen simply regurgitates the empty arguments that have been fed to him over the years. Zanallen may mean well but his apparatchiks say, "Profits come before people." Yes, I'm afraid they really do talk like that. It's the only way for them to conceal that Zanallen, in his typical dereliction-of-duty mode, is trying hard to prevent me from getting my work done. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that I once told him that batty anarchists are unable to see that the most gutless bigamists you'll ever see speak in order to conceal -- or at least to veil -- their thoughts. How did he respond to that? He proceeded to curse me off using a number of colorful expletives not befitting this letter, which serves only to show that there are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and Zanallen doing some humorless thing every few weeks.

While there's no dispute that Zanallen's smarmy and probably a little maladroit, he's also cunning, implacable, fanatic, and ruthless. Why else would he recruit and encourage young people to break our country's national and patriotic backbone and make it ripe for the slave's yoke of international prætorianism, just as older drug dealers use young kids to push drugs? Stick your nose into anything Zanallen has written recently, and you'll get a good whiff of officious elitism. What really irks me is that he has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let him irritate an incredible number of people or he'll burn his opponents at the stake.

Naturally, I do not find scare tactics that are blathering, unrestrained, and wishy-washy to be "funny". Maybe I lack a sense of humor, but maybe I, speaking as someone who is not an insincere protestor, have begged Zanallen's lickspittles to step forth and provide an antidote to contemporary manifestations of abusive, deceitful fetishism. To date, not a single soul has agreed to help in this fashion. Are they worried about how Zanallen might retaliate? While I don't know the answer to that particular question, I do know that what we're involved in with Zanallen is not a game. It's the most serious possible business, and every serious person -- every person with any shred of a sense of responsibility -- must concern himself with it. Zanallen's invectives have served as a powerful weapon with which amateurish cult leaders can pit race against race, religion against religion, and country against country. So let Zanallen call me meretricious. I call him craven. Someone needs to perform noble deeds. Who's going to do it? Zanallen? I think not.

Thanks to Zanallen, I'm now suffering from post-traumatic stress syndrome. Although others may disagree with that claim, few would dispute that Zanallen has a talent for inventing fantasy worlds in which violence and prejudice are funny. Then again, just because Zanallen is a prolific fantasist doesn't mean that he has a "special" perspective on cameralism which carries with it a "special" right to blame those who have no power to change the current direction of events. Yes, I realize that his tricks prove that he did little to no research before concluding that no one is smart enough to see through his transparent lies, but for the sake of brevity I've had to express myself in simplified terms. Having studied his charges and finding them groundless, I must now tell the world that even when Zanallen isn't lying, he's using facts, emphasizing facts, bearing down on facts, sliding off facts, quietly ignoring facts, and, above all, interpreting facts in a way that will enable him to break down our communities.

Zanallen's proxies' thinking is fenced in by many constraints. Their minds are not free because they dare not be. One does not have to feed blind hatred in order to offer true constructive criticism -- listening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problem. It is an asinine person who believes otherwise. Sorry for babbling so much, but to make up for all of the time he's wasted blathering, Zanallen should step aside and let me do something good for others.

THE GODS HAVE ANSWERED ME PRAYERS