The Survey Results

Quote ()

Subtypes are a constant issue here at RERN. So, to try and find a permanent solution, we're asking everyone what they want in Subtypes. Take some time to think about it and say what you really think. This is your own opinion; no one else's.

1: What do you like about Subtypes?

they add a extra level to custimization.

2: What do you dislike about Subtypes?

they don't really improve with lvls, maybe something like extra charges(wind's gust, melee's dodge, cursors' aim) or stronger(double break?(hits tiles(now cracked) as well as target). powerup every 5(unlikely) or 10 levels(slightly better odds). also, when lvling subtypes I'd like to see secondary abilities(I miss wind's bonus dodge)

5: What would you add to them? (Elaborate as much as possible, please.)

see 2 again, but add...

subtype summon(cause we now have objects):

niax's bad ideas: reduced cost(objects cost 10 points less per sig), doubling(rules state that if a sig cools down and the object is still on the field, one overrides the other. this negates that), speed summon(can create a 10 hp cube per turn(or if you want to over complicate it, 10 free points to add to this ability per passive lvlup))

6: What would you like to never see added to them?

they go bye bye, or we start using sig poits to do the lvling thing I've suggested(or cust's, they get the bonus cause they've fought in battle and gotten better at using them.

7: Do you have your own unique ideas about it?

I get the vauge feeling these questions ask the same questions...

or i'm an idiot, which is also very possible...

8: Would you like it if Elements were somehow involved? Explain.

lol flame wind, no, I don't think it would work

9: If Elements were added into it, how would you like to see it done?

>.>; ok, they are repeating...

10: In light of question 9: What would you change?

-_-; ok that's enough...

11: In light of question 9: What would you leave the same?

>[]< stop it!

12: If you like. feel free to add anything else you'd like to say about this topic or the survey itself here.

X[Z] NO! now stop asking questions!! XP

Quote ()

(Jun 23-04:26) Chat-Admin: Right then
(Jun 23-04:26) Chat-Admin: I've seen enough
(Jun 23-04:26) Chat-Admin: MOVING TOPIC
(Jun 23-04:26) Chat-Admin: *Grabs topic by the bottom*
(Jun 23-04:26) Chat-Admin: *Hefts*
(Jun 23-04:26) Chat-Admin: *Throws it at General La-De-Da*
(Jun 23-04:26) Chat-Admin: *Various ideas chip off along the way*
(Jun 23-04:27) Chat-Admin: *One or two clock some members in the head*

Now, to be fair...

Quote ()

Subtypes are a constant issue here at RERN. So, to try and find a permanent solution, we're asking everyone what they want in Subtypes. Take some time to think about it and say what you really think. This is your own opinion; no one else's.

1: What do you like about Subtypes?
They add a little variety.

2: What do you dislike about Subtypes?
They don't add enough. Not cince they were dumbed down from what they were.

3: What would you change about them?
I would make more of them, and I would make them more in-depth, perhaps more unique in relation to one another, than they are now.

4: What would you like to see them as instead?
I wrote this question knowing people wouldn't answer it. Don't feel bad if you didn't.

5: What would you add to them? (Elaborate as much as possible, please.)
I would add incentives and deterrents for choosing a subtype, such that none was better than another.

6: What would you like to never see added to them?
H4X. Enough said.

7: Do you have your own unique ideas about it?
No, I'd rather do what the site wants. For the players, by the players.

8: Would you like it if Elements were somehow involved? Explain.
I'm up for it, yes. I will not elaborate.

9: If Elements were added into it, how would you like to see it done?
Carefully. Fun is the key, not power.

10: In light of question 9: What would you change?
Whatever I was told to.

11: In light of question 9: What would you leave the same?
Anything that isn't broken or doesn't need it.

12: If you like. feel free to add anything else you'd like to say about this topic or the survey itself here.

These are my thoughts on this matter. You told me yours, so I'm sharing mine. -- Pally

Quote ()

Subtypes are a constant issue here at RERN. So, to try and find a permanent solution, we're asking everyone what they want in Subtypes. Take some time to think about it and say what you really think. This is your own opinion; no one else's.

1: What do you like about Subtypes?
Not much, really. I made them originally, so I suppose I have some lingering Father-child feelings towards them.

2: What do you dislike about Subtypes?
They really don't do a damn thing. You get an optional to use passive ability per turn. Wow, totally can't do that with a sig >_>

3: What would you change about them?
More subtypes, more abilities. If you've ever play a Tactics game or Domo, then you would know what I would ideally like. Slots that you can equip abilities and such in. Hell, maybe even free switching between subtypes, and as they level you can gain skills to "equip" while you aren't actively using that subtype. A Bug type with a weakened conversion? Nice.

4: What would you like to see them as instead?
See above. Yeah, I totally answered it~

5: What would you add to them? (Elaborate as much as possible, please.)
Go back to the old original type of thinking, but make it more balanced. Also Above.

6: What would you like to never see added to them?
H4X. - Tru dat homey. Unless it was a Valience Wins button. I could let that slip by.

7: Do you have your own unique ideas about it?
What I said up there. But it'll never happen, too many people like the kamehameha syndrome.

8: Would you like it if Elements were somehow involved? Explain.
Yes, like subtypes above but without free switching. You can start with none, then gain one, then go back to none. But that would be it. Or start with one and go to none.

9: If Elements were added into it, how would you like to see it done?
Lulz. Above.

10: In light of question 9: What would you change?
I would rip the current systems (all of em) to shreds, and redo everything. Probably end up driving people off. So good thing I'm not doing it. Yay for my little baby boards where I can blow up giant mechs in a fashion that I like : D

11: In light of question 9: What would you leave the same?
Anything that isn't broken or doesn't need it.

12: If you like. feel free to add anything else you'd like to say about this topic or the survey itself here.

Ditto to what pally said.

Why exactly are people's private opinions in general la de da again? Seems pretty stupid to me. Not that I care that people know my opinion, but perhaps others might.

Because Twi put it here for some reason. I'd like it back where it came from, if I knew exactly *where* it came from.

Quite simply, I felt people would want to see the results.

-Twi

Honestly, I don't get what's the big deal about this being open to public. It's not like we persecute anyone for thinking differently about what we should do in the hypothetical situation that we change subtypes <_<

I mean, yes, if you vote for Hillary, that'd be a basis to call you sh*tface, but not THIS. And they don't even have the names on them, and if you can tell from the reply who replied, you could've told what he'd say anyway...

Really, if someone minds that others see his opinions, I say he just asks a mod to remove it.

Anyone?

Personally, I approve of people seeing other people's ideas on things. This'll help people see what others were thinking and possibly see which are as good, better, or worse than the ideas they expressed.


I kinda wish I went into more detail on my questionair for some stuff now though...

Quote (Sora-Chan)

Personally, I approve of people seeing other people's ideas on things. This'll help people see what others were thinking and possibly see which are as good, better, or worse than the ideas they expressed.


I kinda wish I went into more detail on my questionair for some stuff now though...

That's nice Sora, but you do realize this was one of those "My opinion and none of your business" surverys, right?

Anyway, yada yada, I hope the person who it belongs to isn't upset, and what not.

hmm? I don't remember it saying anywhere that it wasn't gonna be shared with anyone, just that "it is your opinions, no one else's". Not "your opinions are a private matter and won't be shown to others."


That isnt to be said I was expecting it to be posted to where all of us could see it, heck if I had known that I would of done a better job not leaving hints of who was it that was answering that one questionair. But hey, too late for regrets you know? Gotta live with what was done since theres no going back.



On a different note, I quite enjoyed a number of the results, some even had me laughing for a few. Like the "RAINBOW POOOOOONIES! [froths]" in one of the results