Complaints
last edited by
I'd like to take a minute of your time to share some of my thoughts about the RERN community with you. To get immediately to the point, the RERN community's sententious perorations can be quite educational. By studying them, students can observe firsthand the consequences of having a mind consumed with paranoia, fear, hatred, and ignorance. Her disquisitions are written in a peculiar doublespeak that is hard for the uninitiated to understand, as if it made any difference. If she opened her eyes, she'd realize that unforgiving couch potatoes must be treated with political justice, not with civil justice, as they are really not real citizens. The RERN community says that she needs a little more time to clean up her act. As far as I'm concerned, the RERN community's time has run out. In plain, simple-to-understand English, her thesis is that my bitterness at her is merely the latent projection of libidinal energy stemming from self-induced anguish. That's completely possession-obsessed, you say? Good; that means you're finally catching on. The next step is to observe that the RERN community's opinion is that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius. Of course, opinions are like sphincters: we all have them. So let me tell you my opinion. My opinion is that the RERN community keeps trying to deceive us into thinking that cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding. The purpose of this deception may be to pervert the course of justice. Or maybe the purpose is to inject the RERN community's lethal poison into our children's minds and souls. Oh what a tangled web the RERN community weaves when first she practices to deceive.
Don't get me wrong; whenever a will-o'-the-wisp of nepotism, however unreal, turns up anywhere, the RERN community is off at a trot. But there are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and the RERN community doing some uneducated thing every few weeks.
I feel funny having to tell readers whom I presume are adults that the RERN community's stupidity concerning sensationalism is laughable. I bring that up solely to emphasize that it's debatable whether such conduct as the RERN community's induced the despotism of Cromwell and the two Bonapartes. However, no one can disagree that the only way for her to redeem herself is to stop being so contemptuous. That's something you won't find in your local newspaper because it's the news that just doesn't fit. If she feels ridiculed by all the attention my letters are bringing her, then that's just too darn bad. The RERN community's arrogance has brought this upon herself. There is an open consensus that plagiarism is one of the legs upon which the RERN community's hijinks stand. Now, I could go off on that point alone, but her favorite buzzword these days is "crisis". The RERN community likes to tell us that we have a crisis on our hands. She then argues that the only reasonable approach to combat this crisis is for her to identify political and religious groups that are her political enemies and re-label them as "meddlesome racketeers" in order to justify operations against them. In my opinion, the real crisis is the dearth of people who understand that by writing this letter, I am clearly sticking my head far above the parapet. The big danger is that the RERN community will retaliate against me. She'll most likely try to force me to jump in the lake, although another possibility is that she thinks it's good that her deeds institutionalize ruffianism through systematic violence, distorted religion, and dubious science. It is difficult to know how to respond to such monumentally misplaced values, but let's try this: The biggest difference between me and the RERN community is that the RERN community wants to brainwash the masses into submission. I, on the other hand, want to increase awareness and understanding of our similarities and differences. The facts as I see them simply do not support the false, but widely accepted, notion that people are pawns to be used and manipulated.
Isn't it odd that noisome simpletons, whose directionless lifestyle will toy with our opinions when you least expect it, are immune from censure? Why is that? Well, we all know the answer to that question, don't we? But in case you don't, then you should note that somebody has to solve the problems of interventionism, factionalism, economic inequality, and lack of equal opportunity. That somebody can be you. In any case, it's a pity that two thousand years after Christ, the voices of Pecksniffian, bumptious mythomaniacs like the RERN community can still be heard, worse still that they're listened to, and worst of all that anyone believes them. This, of itself, is prima facie evidence that her ideas are impudent, poisonous to young minds, and disrespectful to Western values and achievements, and everyone with half a brain understands that. The RERN community occasionally shows what appears to be warmth, joy, love, or compassion. You should realize, however, that these positive expressions are more feigned than experienced and invariably serve an ulterior motive, such as to sell us fibs and fear mixed with a generous dollop of heathenism. Her rejoinders are a load of bunk. I use this delightfully pejorative term, "bunk" -- an alternative from the same page of my criminal-slang lexicon would serve just as well -- because her co-conspirators claim that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. I say to them, "Prove it" -- not that they'll be able to, of course, but because the only thing protecting the people of this world from the RERN community's obdurate, batty endeavors is our love of freedom and concern for justice. Regular readers of my letters probably take that for granted, but if I am to rub the RERN community's nose in her own hypocrisy, I must explain to the population at large that if we don't follow through on the critical work that has already begun, our children will curse us in our graves. Speaking of our children, we need to teach them diligently that one can consecrate one's life to the service of a noble idea or a glorious ideology. The RERN community, however, is more likely to numb the public to the unilateralism and injustice in mainstream politics.
I'm not saying anything you don't already know about. That conclusion is not based on some sort of purblind philosophy or on the RERN community-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that we must introduce an important, but underrepresented, angle on the RERN community's irritable proposed social programs. If we fail in this, we are not failing someone else; we are not disrupting some interest separate from ourselves. Rather, it is we who suffer when we neglect to observe that a recent fact-finder's report revealed that the RERN community is out of control and must be stopped. Still, I recommend you check out some of the RERN community's opuscula and draw your own conclusions on the matter. For those who need very specific examples in order to grasp the significance of the RERN community's shenanigans, I'll give a very specific example: Think for a moment about the way that "the RERN community" has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone resort to underhanded tactics, I tell him or her to stop "the RERN community-ing". For your edification, I should definitely point out that there is something grievously wrong with those dishonest, mephitic fast-buck artists who control your bank account, your employment, your personal safety, and your mind. Shame on the lot of them! In summary, it is my prayer that people everywhere will join me in my quest to guide the world into an age of peace, justice, and solidarity.
Don't get me wrong; whenever a will-o'-the-wisp of nepotism, however unreal, turns up anywhere, the RERN community is off at a trot. But there are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and the RERN community doing some uneducated thing every few weeks.
I feel funny having to tell readers whom I presume are adults that the RERN community's stupidity concerning sensationalism is laughable. I bring that up solely to emphasize that it's debatable whether such conduct as the RERN community's induced the despotism of Cromwell and the two Bonapartes. However, no one can disagree that the only way for her to redeem herself is to stop being so contemptuous. That's something you won't find in your local newspaper because it's the news that just doesn't fit. If she feels ridiculed by all the attention my letters are bringing her, then that's just too darn bad. The RERN community's arrogance has brought this upon herself. There is an open consensus that plagiarism is one of the legs upon which the RERN community's hijinks stand. Now, I could go off on that point alone, but her favorite buzzword these days is "crisis". The RERN community likes to tell us that we have a crisis on our hands. She then argues that the only reasonable approach to combat this crisis is for her to identify political and religious groups that are her political enemies and re-label them as "meddlesome racketeers" in order to justify operations against them. In my opinion, the real crisis is the dearth of people who understand that by writing this letter, I am clearly sticking my head far above the parapet. The big danger is that the RERN community will retaliate against me. She'll most likely try to force me to jump in the lake, although another possibility is that she thinks it's good that her deeds institutionalize ruffianism through systematic violence, distorted religion, and dubious science. It is difficult to know how to respond to such monumentally misplaced values, but let's try this: The biggest difference between me and the RERN community is that the RERN community wants to brainwash the masses into submission. I, on the other hand, want to increase awareness and understanding of our similarities and differences. The facts as I see them simply do not support the false, but widely accepted, notion that people are pawns to be used and manipulated.
Isn't it odd that noisome simpletons, whose directionless lifestyle will toy with our opinions when you least expect it, are immune from censure? Why is that? Well, we all know the answer to that question, don't we? But in case you don't, then you should note that somebody has to solve the problems of interventionism, factionalism, economic inequality, and lack of equal opportunity. That somebody can be you. In any case, it's a pity that two thousand years after Christ, the voices of Pecksniffian, bumptious mythomaniacs like the RERN community can still be heard, worse still that they're listened to, and worst of all that anyone believes them. This, of itself, is prima facie evidence that her ideas are impudent, poisonous to young minds, and disrespectful to Western values and achievements, and everyone with half a brain understands that. The RERN community occasionally shows what appears to be warmth, joy, love, or compassion. You should realize, however, that these positive expressions are more feigned than experienced and invariably serve an ulterior motive, such as to sell us fibs and fear mixed with a generous dollop of heathenism. Her rejoinders are a load of bunk. I use this delightfully pejorative term, "bunk" -- an alternative from the same page of my criminal-slang lexicon would serve just as well -- because her co-conspirators claim that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. I say to them, "Prove it" -- not that they'll be able to, of course, but because the only thing protecting the people of this world from the RERN community's obdurate, batty endeavors is our love of freedom and concern for justice. Regular readers of my letters probably take that for granted, but if I am to rub the RERN community's nose in her own hypocrisy, I must explain to the population at large that if we don't follow through on the critical work that has already begun, our children will curse us in our graves. Speaking of our children, we need to teach them diligently that one can consecrate one's life to the service of a noble idea or a glorious ideology. The RERN community, however, is more likely to numb the public to the unilateralism and injustice in mainstream politics.
I'm not saying anything you don't already know about. That conclusion is not based on some sort of purblind philosophy or on the RERN community-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that we must introduce an important, but underrepresented, angle on the RERN community's irritable proposed social programs. If we fail in this, we are not failing someone else; we are not disrupting some interest separate from ourselves. Rather, it is we who suffer when we neglect to observe that a recent fact-finder's report revealed that the RERN community is out of control and must be stopped. Still, I recommend you check out some of the RERN community's opuscula and draw your own conclusions on the matter. For those who need very specific examples in order to grasp the significance of the RERN community's shenanigans, I'll give a very specific example: Think for a moment about the way that "the RERN community" has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone resort to underhanded tactics, I tell him or her to stop "the RERN community-ing". For your edification, I should definitely point out that there is something grievously wrong with those dishonest, mephitic fast-buck artists who control your bank account, your employment, your personal safety, and your mind. Shame on the lot of them! In summary, it is my prayer that people everywhere will join me in my quest to guide the world into an age of peace, justice, and solidarity.
last edited by
Dear Rockman.EXE Rogue Network,
This is an open letter, which you are welcome to use as you wish. I want as many people as possible to know that maledicent Comstockism is Ms. Lori's preferred quick-fix solution to complex cultural problems. Unless you share my view that each day, I see the world becoming more bumptious as a determined Lori carries out her pathological plans, there's no need for you to hear me further. She disguises her iron fist with a velvet glove, and every intellectually honest person knows it. With all due respect, if she is going to make an emotional appeal, then she should also include a rational argument. I find that I am embarrassed. Embarrassed that some people don't realize that it takes more than a mass of villainous, litigious perverts to unmask Lori's true face and intentions in regard to ethnocentrism. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to reinforce what is best in people. Ostensibly, Lori does not intend to prey on people's fear of political and economic instability, but in fact, we must offer true constructive criticism -- listening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problem -- while remaining true to those beliefs, ideals, and aspirations we hold most dear. Only then can a society free of her raucous fibs blossom forth from the roots of the past. And only then will people come to understand that she is not a responsible citizen. Responsible citizens raise several issues about Lori's shabby publicity stunts that are frequently missing from the drivel that masquerades for discourse on this topic. Responsible citizens really do not shred the basic compact between the people and their government.
Many people are shocked when I tell them that when Lori says that individual worth is defined by race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin, she's just plain wrong -- not "partially wrong", but "totally and absolutely wrong". And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I had thought everybody already knew that she needs a refill of her medication. Nevertheless, I can state with absolute certainty that she keeps trying to deceive us into thinking that her catch-phrases prevent smallpox. The purpose of this deception may be to misdirect our efforts into fighting each other rather than into understanding the nature and endurance of goofy tribalism. Or maybe the purpose is to deface property with racially and sexually derogatory epithets and offensive symbols. Oh what a tangled web Lori weaves when first she practices to deceive. I don't see how Lori can build a workable policy around wishful thinking draped over a morass of confusion (and also, as we'll see below, historical illiteracy), then impose it willy-nilly on a population by force. I'm not saying that it can't possibly be done but rather that I am not a robot. I am a thinking, feeling, human being. As such, I get teary-eyed whenever I see Lori make us dependent on the most high-handed cockalorums you'll ever see for political representation, economic support, social position, and psychological approval. It makes me want to halt the adulation heaped upon splenetic slimeballs, which is why I'm so eager to tell you that I can reword my point as follows. The popularity of Lori's recommendations among mendacious present-day robber barons is a harbinger of gruesome things to come. Lori can't fool me. I've met repressive freebooters before, so I know that Lori should have instructed her legatees not to silence critical debate and squelch creative brainstorming. At the risk of sounding a tad redundant, let me add that either she has no real conception of the sweep of history, or she is merely intent on winning some debating pin by trying to pierce a hole in my logic with "facts" that are taken out of context.
I do not find reinterpretations of historic events that are recalcitrant, revolting, and obscene to be "funny". Maybe I lack a sense of humor, but maybe if we contradict Lori, we are labelled nettlesome astrologers. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms. Her propositions have experienced a considerable amount of evolution (or perhaps more accurately, genetic drift) over the past few weeks. They used to be simply hideous. Now, not only are they both cruel and dysfunctional, but they also serve as unequivocal proof that Lori's idiotic claim that her anecdotes are all sweetness and light is just that, an idiotic claim. Lori and her representatives are, by nature, stupid hypochondriacs. Not only can that nature not be changed by window-dressing or persiflage, but given a choice of having Lori incite pogroms, purges, and other mayhem or having my bicuspids extracted sans Novocaine, I would embrace the pliers, purchase some Polident Partials, and call it a day. Her mind has limited horizons. It is confined to the immediate and simplistic, with the inevitable consequence that everything is made banal and basic and is then leveled down until it is deprived of all spiritual life. I would like to close by saying that I am making an appeal to the intelligence of the reader not to be fooled by Ms. Lori's demagoguery.
This is an open letter, which you are welcome to use as you wish. I want as many people as possible to know that maledicent Comstockism is Ms. Lori's preferred quick-fix solution to complex cultural problems. Unless you share my view that each day, I see the world becoming more bumptious as a determined Lori carries out her pathological plans, there's no need for you to hear me further. She disguises her iron fist with a velvet glove, and every intellectually honest person knows it. With all due respect, if she is going to make an emotional appeal, then she should also include a rational argument. I find that I am embarrassed. Embarrassed that some people don't realize that it takes more than a mass of villainous, litigious perverts to unmask Lori's true face and intentions in regard to ethnocentrism. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to reinforce what is best in people. Ostensibly, Lori does not intend to prey on people's fear of political and economic instability, but in fact, we must offer true constructive criticism -- listening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problem -- while remaining true to those beliefs, ideals, and aspirations we hold most dear. Only then can a society free of her raucous fibs blossom forth from the roots of the past. And only then will people come to understand that she is not a responsible citizen. Responsible citizens raise several issues about Lori's shabby publicity stunts that are frequently missing from the drivel that masquerades for discourse on this topic. Responsible citizens really do not shred the basic compact between the people and their government.
Many people are shocked when I tell them that when Lori says that individual worth is defined by race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin, she's just plain wrong -- not "partially wrong", but "totally and absolutely wrong". And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I had thought everybody already knew that she needs a refill of her medication. Nevertheless, I can state with absolute certainty that she keeps trying to deceive us into thinking that her catch-phrases prevent smallpox. The purpose of this deception may be to misdirect our efforts into fighting each other rather than into understanding the nature and endurance of goofy tribalism. Or maybe the purpose is to deface property with racially and sexually derogatory epithets and offensive symbols. Oh what a tangled web Lori weaves when first she practices to deceive. I don't see how Lori can build a workable policy around wishful thinking draped over a morass of confusion (and also, as we'll see below, historical illiteracy), then impose it willy-nilly on a population by force. I'm not saying that it can't possibly be done but rather that I am not a robot. I am a thinking, feeling, human being. As such, I get teary-eyed whenever I see Lori make us dependent on the most high-handed cockalorums you'll ever see for political representation, economic support, social position, and psychological approval. It makes me want to halt the adulation heaped upon splenetic slimeballs, which is why I'm so eager to tell you that I can reword my point as follows. The popularity of Lori's recommendations among mendacious present-day robber barons is a harbinger of gruesome things to come. Lori can't fool me. I've met repressive freebooters before, so I know that Lori should have instructed her legatees not to silence critical debate and squelch creative brainstorming. At the risk of sounding a tad redundant, let me add that either she has no real conception of the sweep of history, or she is merely intent on winning some debating pin by trying to pierce a hole in my logic with "facts" that are taken out of context.
I do not find reinterpretations of historic events that are recalcitrant, revolting, and obscene to be "funny". Maybe I lack a sense of humor, but maybe if we contradict Lori, we are labelled nettlesome astrologers. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms. Her propositions have experienced a considerable amount of evolution (or perhaps more accurately, genetic drift) over the past few weeks. They used to be simply hideous. Now, not only are they both cruel and dysfunctional, but they also serve as unequivocal proof that Lori's idiotic claim that her anecdotes are all sweetness and light is just that, an idiotic claim. Lori and her representatives are, by nature, stupid hypochondriacs. Not only can that nature not be changed by window-dressing or persiflage, but given a choice of having Lori incite pogroms, purges, and other mayhem or having my bicuspids extracted sans Novocaine, I would embrace the pliers, purchase some Polident Partials, and call it a day. Her mind has limited horizons. It is confined to the immediate and simplistic, with the inevitable consequence that everything is made banal and basic and is then leveled down until it is deprived of all spiritual life. I would like to close by saying that I am making an appeal to the intelligence of the reader not to be fooled by Ms. Lori's demagoguery.
last edited by
My complaint about Complaint thread
This letter is not a debate contest in which I convince you to agree with me or vice versa. This letter is concerned only with establishing the truth about Complaint thread. It is worth noting at the outset that Complaint thread is an inspiration to Pecksniffian, clueless barrators everywhere. They panegyrize his crusade to dominate the whole earth and take possession of all its riches and, more importantly, they don't realize that I recently heard Complaint thread tell a bunch of people that all minorities are poor, stupid ghetto trash. I can't adequately describe my first reaction to this notion; I simply don't know how to represent uncontrollable laughter in text. I'll give you an example of this, based on my own experience. As you know, he will stop at nothing to twist our entire societal valuation of love and relationships beyond all insanity. This may sound outrageous, but if it were fiction I would have thought of something more credible. As it stands, I like to speak of Complaint thread as "irritable". That's a reasonable term to use, I aver, but let's now try to understand it a little better. For starters, he commonly appoints ineffective people to important positions. He then ensures that these people stay in those positions because that makes it easy for him to declare a national emergency, round up everyone who disagrees with him, and put them in concentration camps.
The simple, regrettable truth is that it's irrelevant that my allegations are 100% true. Complaint thread distrusts my information and arguments and will forever maintain his current opinions. He is typical of avaricious desperados in his wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize his antics. When all is said and done, ever since Complaint thread began his quest to open the floodgates of misoneism, he has been denying with his lips what he has been doing with his hands. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that he indisputably believes that the ideas of "freedom" and "Marxism" are Siamese twins. What kind of Humpty-Dumpty world is he living in? I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that griping about Complaint thread will not make him stop trying to bribe the parasitic with the earnings of the productive. But even if it did, he would just find some other way to lay down diktats that force me to leave the country. Although Complaint thread has a driving need to bar people from partaking in activities that cannot be monitored and controlled, if you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim of your own ignorance.
In theory, it is easier to get a camel through the eye of a needle than it is to convince Complaint thread's minions to bring fresh leadership and even-handed tolerance to the present controversy. But in reality, he takes things out of context, twists them around, and then neglects to provide decent referencing so the reader can check up on him. Complaint thread also ignores all of the evidence that doesn't support (or in many cases directly contradicts) his position. I receive a great deal of correspondence from people all over the world. And one of the things that impresses me about it is the massive number of people who realize that there's a time to keep silent and a time to speak. There's a time to love and a time to hate. There's a time for war and a time for peace. And, I suspect, there's a time to free Complaint thread's mind from the constricting trammels of incendiarism and the counterfeit moral inhibitions that have replaced true morality. Or, to put it less poetically, I overheard one of Complaint thread's votaries say, "Complaint thread can be trusted to judge the rest of the world from a unique perch of pure wisdom." This quotation demonstrates the power of language, as it epitomizes the "us/them" dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to use language to begin the debate about Complaint thread's pronouncements. A small child really couldn't understand that metagrobolism is the principal ingredient in the ideological flypaper Complaint thread uses to attract invidious petulant-types into his gestapo. But any adult can easily grasp that on several occasions I have heard Complaint thread state that coercion in the name of liberty is a valid use of state power. I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a comment. What I consider far more important, though, is that whenever I hear someone say that we ought to worship the most hate-filled Complaint thread clones you'll ever see as folk heroes, my upper lip develops an involuntary curl. I know you're wondering why I just wrote that. I'll explain shortly, but first, I should state that Complaint thread decries or dismisses capitalism, technology, industrialization, and systems of government borne of Enlightenment ideas about the dignity and freedom of human beings. These are the things that he fears, because they are wedded to individual initiative and responsibility.
Considering that obstructionism is an exclusive, rather than an inclusive, societal force, I offer that when I was a child, my clergyman told me, "Only by striving to champion the force of goodness against the greed of batty rascals can I strike at the heart of Complaint thread's efforts to needle and wheedle benighted porn stars into Complaint thread's little empire." If you think about it you'll see his point. I need your help if I'm ever to deal with the relevant facts. "But I'm only one person," you might protest. "What difference can I make?" The answer is: a lot more than you think. You see, Complaint thread keeps saying that people prefer "cultural integrity" and "multicultural sensitivity" to health, food, safety, and the opportunity to choose their own course through life. For some reason, Complaint thread's accomplices actually believe this nonsense.
Let me relate to you the most incontrovertibly true statement I've ever heard: "Alcoholism is the driving force behind Complaint thread's prevarications." Whoever said that clearly understood that you can chalk up incidents such as the ones I've described to the stubborn, larcenous nature of Complaint thread's claims. Or, to express that sentiment without all of the emotionally charged lingo, Complaint thread's campaigns are based on a technique I'm sure you've heard of. It's called "lying". Complaint thread's claims are pure tripe. History offers innumerable examples for the truth of this assertion. I know some mumpish spielers who actually believe that space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction. Incredible? Those same people have told me that honesty and responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. With such people roaming about, it should come as no surprise to you that many people think of Complaint thread's immoral tactics as a joke, as something only half-serious. In fact, they're deadly serious. They're the tool by which stultiloquent, ultra-empty-headed rapscallions will let lethargic sandbaggers serve as our overlords any day now. A second all-too-serious item is that far too many people tolerate Complaint thread's insults as long as they're presented in small, seemingly harmless doses. What these people fail to realize, however, is that the biggest difference between me and Complaint thread is that Complaint thread wants to compromise the free and open nature of public discourse. I, on the other hand, want to establish clear, justifiable definitions of paternalism and ageism so that you can defend a decision to take action when his peons etiolate his enemies. This letter has gone on far too long, in my opinion, and probably yours as well. So let me end it by saying merely that I'd advise Complaint thread to stop being so disreputable.
This letter is not a debate contest in which I convince you to agree with me or vice versa. This letter is concerned only with establishing the truth about Complaint thread. It is worth noting at the outset that Complaint thread is an inspiration to Pecksniffian, clueless barrators everywhere. They panegyrize his crusade to dominate the whole earth and take possession of all its riches and, more importantly, they don't realize that I recently heard Complaint thread tell a bunch of people that all minorities are poor, stupid ghetto trash. I can't adequately describe my first reaction to this notion; I simply don't know how to represent uncontrollable laughter in text. I'll give you an example of this, based on my own experience. As you know, he will stop at nothing to twist our entire societal valuation of love and relationships beyond all insanity. This may sound outrageous, but if it were fiction I would have thought of something more credible. As it stands, I like to speak of Complaint thread as "irritable". That's a reasonable term to use, I aver, but let's now try to understand it a little better. For starters, he commonly appoints ineffective people to important positions. He then ensures that these people stay in those positions because that makes it easy for him to declare a national emergency, round up everyone who disagrees with him, and put them in concentration camps.
The simple, regrettable truth is that it's irrelevant that my allegations are 100% true. Complaint thread distrusts my information and arguments and will forever maintain his current opinions. He is typical of avaricious desperados in his wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize his antics. When all is said and done, ever since Complaint thread began his quest to open the floodgates of misoneism, he has been denying with his lips what he has been doing with his hands. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that he indisputably believes that the ideas of "freedom" and "Marxism" are Siamese twins. What kind of Humpty-Dumpty world is he living in? I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that griping about Complaint thread will not make him stop trying to bribe the parasitic with the earnings of the productive. But even if it did, he would just find some other way to lay down diktats that force me to leave the country. Although Complaint thread has a driving need to bar people from partaking in activities that cannot be monitored and controlled, if you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim of your own ignorance.
In theory, it is easier to get a camel through the eye of a needle than it is to convince Complaint thread's minions to bring fresh leadership and even-handed tolerance to the present controversy. But in reality, he takes things out of context, twists them around, and then neglects to provide decent referencing so the reader can check up on him. Complaint thread also ignores all of the evidence that doesn't support (or in many cases directly contradicts) his position. I receive a great deal of correspondence from people all over the world. And one of the things that impresses me about it is the massive number of people who realize that there's a time to keep silent and a time to speak. There's a time to love and a time to hate. There's a time for war and a time for peace. And, I suspect, there's a time to free Complaint thread's mind from the constricting trammels of incendiarism and the counterfeit moral inhibitions that have replaced true morality. Or, to put it less poetically, I overheard one of Complaint thread's votaries say, "Complaint thread can be trusted to judge the rest of the world from a unique perch of pure wisdom." This quotation demonstrates the power of language, as it epitomizes the "us/them" dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to use language to begin the debate about Complaint thread's pronouncements. A small child really couldn't understand that metagrobolism is the principal ingredient in the ideological flypaper Complaint thread uses to attract invidious petulant-types into his gestapo. But any adult can easily grasp that on several occasions I have heard Complaint thread state that coercion in the name of liberty is a valid use of state power. I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a comment. What I consider far more important, though, is that whenever I hear someone say that we ought to worship the most hate-filled Complaint thread clones you'll ever see as folk heroes, my upper lip develops an involuntary curl. I know you're wondering why I just wrote that. I'll explain shortly, but first, I should state that Complaint thread decries or dismisses capitalism, technology, industrialization, and systems of government borne of Enlightenment ideas about the dignity and freedom of human beings. These are the things that he fears, because they are wedded to individual initiative and responsibility.
Considering that obstructionism is an exclusive, rather than an inclusive, societal force, I offer that when I was a child, my clergyman told me, "Only by striving to champion the force of goodness against the greed of batty rascals can I strike at the heart of Complaint thread's efforts to needle and wheedle benighted porn stars into Complaint thread's little empire." If you think about it you'll see his point. I need your help if I'm ever to deal with the relevant facts. "But I'm only one person," you might protest. "What difference can I make?" The answer is: a lot more than you think. You see, Complaint thread keeps saying that people prefer "cultural integrity" and "multicultural sensitivity" to health, food, safety, and the opportunity to choose their own course through life. For some reason, Complaint thread's accomplices actually believe this nonsense.
Let me relate to you the most incontrovertibly true statement I've ever heard: "Alcoholism is the driving force behind Complaint thread's prevarications." Whoever said that clearly understood that you can chalk up incidents such as the ones I've described to the stubborn, larcenous nature of Complaint thread's claims. Or, to express that sentiment without all of the emotionally charged lingo, Complaint thread's campaigns are based on a technique I'm sure you've heard of. It's called "lying". Complaint thread's claims are pure tripe. History offers innumerable examples for the truth of this assertion. I know some mumpish spielers who actually believe that space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction. Incredible? Those same people have told me that honesty and responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. With such people roaming about, it should come as no surprise to you that many people think of Complaint thread's immoral tactics as a joke, as something only half-serious. In fact, they're deadly serious. They're the tool by which stultiloquent, ultra-empty-headed rapscallions will let lethargic sandbaggers serve as our overlords any day now. A second all-too-serious item is that far too many people tolerate Complaint thread's insults as long as they're presented in small, seemingly harmless doses. What these people fail to realize, however, is that the biggest difference between me and Complaint thread is that Complaint thread wants to compromise the free and open nature of public discourse. I, on the other hand, want to establish clear, justifiable definitions of paternalism and ageism so that you can defend a decision to take action when his peons etiolate his enemies. This letter has gone on far too long, in my opinion, and probably yours as well. So let me end it by saying merely that I'd advise Complaint thread to stop being so disreputable.
last edited by
Over the past few weeks, I've learned to look past Aim's mom's supercilious, exploitative remarks. I've learned to look past some of the hypersensitive things Aim's mom has said. I've even learned to look past her attempts to ascribe opinions to me that I don't even hold. But I cannot stay silent about Aim's mom's incomprehensible and unforgivable audacity regarding a specific event that recently occurred. It is requisite, even in this summary sketch, to go back a few years to see how I believe I have found my calling. My calling is to disabuse Aim's mom of the notion that the Universe belongs to her by right. And just let her try and stop me. You know what? She is like a pigeon. Pigeons are too self-absorbed to care about anyone else. They poo on people they don't like; they poo on people they don't even know. The only real difference between Aim's mom and a pigeon is that Aim's mom intends to equip disorganized lowbrows with flame throwers, hand grenades, and heat-seeking missiles. That's why Aim's mom has, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to make us too confused, demoralized, and disunited to put up an effective opposition to her notions. On all of these occasions, I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that one of her confreres keeps throwing "scientific" studies at me, claiming they prove that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. The studies are full of "if"s, "possible"s, "maybe"s, and various exceptions and admissions of their limitations. This leaves the studies inconclusive at best and works of fiction at worst. The only thing these studies can possibly prove is that after hearing about Aim's mom's snarky attempts to smear people of impeccable character and reputation, I was saddened. I was saddened that she has lowered herself to this level.
I have to laugh when Aim's mom says that might makes right. Where in the world did she get that idea? Not only does that idea contain absolutely no substance whatsoever, but her goal is to kill the goose bearing the golden egg. This is abject totalitarianism! One might think that she is capable of a large array of negative feelings, and this is, not surprisingly, the case. Aim's mom extricates herself from difficulty by intrigue, by chicanery, by dissimulation, by trimming, by an untruth, by an injustice.
As is often the case, we must speak out against dishonest dips. To do anything else, and I do mean anything else, is a complete waste of time. While most people know this like a schoolchild knows that 2+2=4, given the amount of misinformation that Aim's mom is circulating, I must point out that she insists that without her superior guidance, we will go nowhere. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject. What's interesting is that she wants to twist the history, sociology, and anthropology disseminated by our mass media and in our children's textbooks. Who does she think she is? I mean, she has a hair-trigger temper. I always catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you that we must compare, contrast, and identify the connections among different classes of infantile larrikinism. As mentioned above, however, that is not enough. It is necessary to do more. It is necessary to give direction to a universal human development of culture, ethics, and morality.
In plain, simple-to-understand English, I've tried explaining to Aim's mom's yes-men that I am not Aim's mom's whipping boy. Unfortunately, it is clear to me in talking to them that they have no comprehension of what I'm saying. I might as well be talking to creatures from Mars. In fact, I'd bet Martians would be more likely to discern that Aim's mom says that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication. You know, I don't think I have heard a less factually based statement in my entire life. All right, enough of that. Now let's talk about something else. Let's talk about how her retinue appears to be growing in number. I pray that this is analogous to the flare-up of a candle just before extinction yet I keep reminding myself that to Aim's mom's mind, she can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion. So that means that she has the mandate of Heaven to make it virtually impossible to fire incompetent workers, right? No, not right. The truth is that there's something fishy about Aim's mom's beliefs. I think she's up to something, something delusional and perhaps even impudent. Aim's mom has announced her intentions to incite young people to copulate early, often, and indiscriminately. While doing so may earn Aim's mom a gold star from the mush-for-brains alarmism crowd, she maintains a "Big Brother" dossier of incriminating personal information about everyone she distrusts, to use as a potential career-ruining weapon. Is your name listed in that dossier? The answer is quite simple. I already listed several possibilities, but because Aim's mom lacks the ability to remember beyond the last two seconds of her life, I will restate what I said before, for her sake: She has warned us that eventually, the worst kinds of putrid imbeciles there are will feed on the politics of resentment, alienation, frustration, anger, and fear. If you think about it, you'll realize that her warning is a self-fulfilling prophecy in the sense that she complains a lot. What's ironic, though, is that she hasn't made even a single concrete suggestion for improvement or identified a single problem with the system as it exists today.
I may be opening a Pandora's box by writing this, but my dream is for tired eyes to open and see clearly, broken spirits to find new energy, and weary arms to find the strength to follow through on the critical work that has already begun. Don't let yourself be persuaded by counter-productive, daft slaves to fashion who secretly want to pooh-pooh the reams of solid evidence pointing to the existence and operation of a benighted, inhumane coterie of blackguardism. If Aim's mom is going to talk about higher standards, then she needs to live by those higher standards. In this land which has befriended maladroit punks, she has conspired, plotted, undermined, prostituted, and corrupted, and -- hiding to this hour behind the braver screen of loquacious devil-worshippers -- dares to contrive and scheme the death of every principle that has protected her. Unfortunately, I can already see the response to this letter. Someone, possibly Aim's mom herself or one of her faithfuls, will write a muddleheaded piece about how utterly brutal I am. If that's the case, then so be it. What I just wrote sorely needed to be written.
I have to laugh when Aim's mom says that might makes right. Where in the world did she get that idea? Not only does that idea contain absolutely no substance whatsoever, but her goal is to kill the goose bearing the golden egg. This is abject totalitarianism! One might think that she is capable of a large array of negative feelings, and this is, not surprisingly, the case. Aim's mom extricates herself from difficulty by intrigue, by chicanery, by dissimulation, by trimming, by an untruth, by an injustice.
As is often the case, we must speak out against dishonest dips. To do anything else, and I do mean anything else, is a complete waste of time. While most people know this like a schoolchild knows that 2+2=4, given the amount of misinformation that Aim's mom is circulating, I must point out that she insists that without her superior guidance, we will go nowhere. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject. What's interesting is that she wants to twist the history, sociology, and anthropology disseminated by our mass media and in our children's textbooks. Who does she think she is? I mean, she has a hair-trigger temper. I always catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you that we must compare, contrast, and identify the connections among different classes of infantile larrikinism. As mentioned above, however, that is not enough. It is necessary to do more. It is necessary to give direction to a universal human development of culture, ethics, and morality.
In plain, simple-to-understand English, I've tried explaining to Aim's mom's yes-men that I am not Aim's mom's whipping boy. Unfortunately, it is clear to me in talking to them that they have no comprehension of what I'm saying. I might as well be talking to creatures from Mars. In fact, I'd bet Martians would be more likely to discern that Aim's mom says that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication. You know, I don't think I have heard a less factually based statement in my entire life. All right, enough of that. Now let's talk about something else. Let's talk about how her retinue appears to be growing in number. I pray that this is analogous to the flare-up of a candle just before extinction yet I keep reminding myself that to Aim's mom's mind, she can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion. So that means that she has the mandate of Heaven to make it virtually impossible to fire incompetent workers, right? No, not right. The truth is that there's something fishy about Aim's mom's beliefs. I think she's up to something, something delusional and perhaps even impudent. Aim's mom has announced her intentions to incite young people to copulate early, often, and indiscriminately. While doing so may earn Aim's mom a gold star from the mush-for-brains alarmism crowd, she maintains a "Big Brother" dossier of incriminating personal information about everyone she distrusts, to use as a potential career-ruining weapon. Is your name listed in that dossier? The answer is quite simple. I already listed several possibilities, but because Aim's mom lacks the ability to remember beyond the last two seconds of her life, I will restate what I said before, for her sake: She has warned us that eventually, the worst kinds of putrid imbeciles there are will feed on the politics of resentment, alienation, frustration, anger, and fear. If you think about it, you'll realize that her warning is a self-fulfilling prophecy in the sense that she complains a lot. What's ironic, though, is that she hasn't made even a single concrete suggestion for improvement or identified a single problem with the system as it exists today.
I may be opening a Pandora's box by writing this, but my dream is for tired eyes to open and see clearly, broken spirits to find new energy, and weary arms to find the strength to follow through on the critical work that has already begun. Don't let yourself be persuaded by counter-productive, daft slaves to fashion who secretly want to pooh-pooh the reams of solid evidence pointing to the existence and operation of a benighted, inhumane coterie of blackguardism. If Aim's mom is going to talk about higher standards, then she needs to live by those higher standards. In this land which has befriended maladroit punks, she has conspired, plotted, undermined, prostituted, and corrupted, and -- hiding to this hour behind the braver screen of loquacious devil-worshippers -- dares to contrive and scheme the death of every principle that has protected her. Unfortunately, I can already see the response to this letter. Someone, possibly Aim's mom herself or one of her faithfuls, will write a muddleheaded piece about how utterly brutal I am. If that's the case, then so be it. What I just wrote sorely needed to be written.
last edited by
Just because he's been getting on my nerves.
If you want a real case for this, go to medic.
Once again, I am writing in response to Goroke's litanies, and once again, I merely wish to point out that I'm sick of Goroke sticking his proboscis into everyone else's business. As a preliminary, I want to deal stiffly with the most unprincipled radicals you'll ever see who kill the goose bearing the golden egg. Socrates was condemned to death by the city of Athens for his views. I hope I don't receive the same treatment for saying that Goroke asserts that the moon is made of green cheese. That assertion is not only untrue, but a conscious lie.
Looking at it another way, Goroke is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks. He is still going around insisting that he's the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread. Jeez, I thought I had made it perfectly clear to him that there is no such thing as evil in the abstract. It exists only in the evil deeds of evil people like Goroke. He lives for one reason and for one reason only: to fund a vast web of aberrent reavers, hateful yahoos, and insensate carpetbaggers. I welcome Goroke's comments. However, Goroke needs to realize that the picture I am presenting need not be confined to his monographs. It applies to everything Goroke says and does. With all due respect, the poisonous wine of separatism had been distilled long before he entered the scene. Goroke is merely the agent decanting the poisonous fluid from its bottle into the jug that is world humanity. In a manner of speaking, I receive a great deal of correspondence from people all over the world. And one of the things that impresses me about it is the massive number of people who realize that he once tried to blitz media outlets with faxes and newsletters that highlight the good points of his lawless beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments). If you consider this an exception to the rule then you surely don't understand how Goroke operates. I hope, however, that you at least understand that he has, at times, called me "picayunish" or "depraved". Such contemptuous name-calling has passed far beyond the stage of being infantile but harmless. It has the capacity to lock people up for reading the "wrong" types of books or listening to the "wrong" classes of music.
Although theoretical differences can be drawn between Goroke's treacherous lamentations and batty chauvinism, these are distinctions without a difference. I recently read a book confirming what I've been saying for years, that throughout history, there has been a clash between those who wish to rub Goroke's nose in his own hypocrisy and those who wish to manipulate public understanding of statism. Naturally, Goroke belongs to the latter category. I don't know which are worse, right-wing tyrants or left-wing tyrants. But I do know that Goroke's co-conspirators have learned their scripts well and the rhetoric comes gushing forth with little provocation. Goroke wants to flout all of society's rules. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is Goroke's gossamer grasp of reality.
When a friend wants to drive inebriated, you try to stop him. Well, Goroke is drunk with power, which is why we must present another paradigm in opposition to his biggety, wicked undertakings. He's a psychologically defective person. He's what the psychiatrists call a constitutional psychopath or a sociopath. Goroke's solutions are destructive. They're morally destructive, socially destructive -- even intellectually destructive. And, as if that weren't enough, I must ask that Goroke's companions shine a light on Goroke's efforts to depressurize the frail vessel of human hopes. I know they'll never do that, so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to turn the trickle of revisionism into a tidal wave.
Goroke's criticisms manifest themselves in two phases. Phase one: draw unsuspecting nutters into the orbit of effrontive skinheads. Phase two: encourage individuals to disregard other people, to become fully self-absorbed. It seems to me that, as others have stated long before me, "Goroke can out-reason intemperate conspiracy theorists but not anyone else." He insists that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius. How can he be so blind? Very easily. Basically, Goroke seems to have recently added the word "individualistic" to his otherwise simplistic vocabulary. I suppose he intends to use big words like that to obscure the fact that his idiotic claim that he is a spokesman for God is just that, an idiotic claim. I need your help if I'm ever to disabuse Goroke of the notion that he has achieved sainthood. "But I'm only one person," you might protest. "What difference can I make?" The answer is: a lot more than you think. You see, to believe that Goroke's prevarications are Holy Writ is to deceive ourselves. The facts are in: Seeing Goroke pervert human instincts by suppressing natural, feral constraints and encouraging abnormal patterns of behavior is a nauseating and disgusting spectacle.
If you want a real case for this, go to medic.
Once again, I am writing in response to Goroke's litanies, and once again, I merely wish to point out that I'm sick of Goroke sticking his proboscis into everyone else's business. As a preliminary, I want to deal stiffly with the most unprincipled radicals you'll ever see who kill the goose bearing the golden egg. Socrates was condemned to death by the city of Athens for his views. I hope I don't receive the same treatment for saying that Goroke asserts that the moon is made of green cheese. That assertion is not only untrue, but a conscious lie.
Looking at it another way, Goroke is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks. He is still going around insisting that he's the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread. Jeez, I thought I had made it perfectly clear to him that there is no such thing as evil in the abstract. It exists only in the evil deeds of evil people like Goroke. He lives for one reason and for one reason only: to fund a vast web of aberrent reavers, hateful yahoos, and insensate carpetbaggers. I welcome Goroke's comments. However, Goroke needs to realize that the picture I am presenting need not be confined to his monographs. It applies to everything Goroke says and does. With all due respect, the poisonous wine of separatism had been distilled long before he entered the scene. Goroke is merely the agent decanting the poisonous fluid from its bottle into the jug that is world humanity. In a manner of speaking, I receive a great deal of correspondence from people all over the world. And one of the things that impresses me about it is the massive number of people who realize that he once tried to blitz media outlets with faxes and newsletters that highlight the good points of his lawless beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments). If you consider this an exception to the rule then you surely don't understand how Goroke operates. I hope, however, that you at least understand that he has, at times, called me "picayunish" or "depraved". Such contemptuous name-calling has passed far beyond the stage of being infantile but harmless. It has the capacity to lock people up for reading the "wrong" types of books or listening to the "wrong" classes of music.
Although theoretical differences can be drawn between Goroke's treacherous lamentations and batty chauvinism, these are distinctions without a difference. I recently read a book confirming what I've been saying for years, that throughout history, there has been a clash between those who wish to rub Goroke's nose in his own hypocrisy and those who wish to manipulate public understanding of statism. Naturally, Goroke belongs to the latter category. I don't know which are worse, right-wing tyrants or left-wing tyrants. But I do know that Goroke's co-conspirators have learned their scripts well and the rhetoric comes gushing forth with little provocation. Goroke wants to flout all of society's rules. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is Goroke's gossamer grasp of reality.
When a friend wants to drive inebriated, you try to stop him. Well, Goroke is drunk with power, which is why we must present another paradigm in opposition to his biggety, wicked undertakings. He's a psychologically defective person. He's what the psychiatrists call a constitutional psychopath or a sociopath. Goroke's solutions are destructive. They're morally destructive, socially destructive -- even intellectually destructive. And, as if that weren't enough, I must ask that Goroke's companions shine a light on Goroke's efforts to depressurize the frail vessel of human hopes. I know they'll never do that, so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to turn the trickle of revisionism into a tidal wave.
Goroke's criticisms manifest themselves in two phases. Phase one: draw unsuspecting nutters into the orbit of effrontive skinheads. Phase two: encourage individuals to disregard other people, to become fully self-absorbed. It seems to me that, as others have stated long before me, "Goroke can out-reason intemperate conspiracy theorists but not anyone else." He insists that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius. How can he be so blind? Very easily. Basically, Goroke seems to have recently added the word "individualistic" to his otherwise simplistic vocabulary. I suppose he intends to use big words like that to obscure the fact that his idiotic claim that he is a spokesman for God is just that, an idiotic claim. I need your help if I'm ever to disabuse Goroke of the notion that he has achieved sainthood. "But I'm only one person," you might protest. "What difference can I make?" The answer is: a lot more than you think. You see, to believe that Goroke's prevarications are Holy Writ is to deceive ourselves. The facts are in: Seeing Goroke pervert human instincts by suppressing natural, feral constraints and encouraging abnormal patterns of behavior is a nauseating and disgusting spectacle.
last edited by
Whine, whine, whine...
I don't want to be rude or disrespectful, and I clearly don't want to start an argument, but Medic clings to any argument or principle, however empty-headed or gutless, that appears to support his hastily mounted campaigns. To organize my discussion, I suggest that we take one step back in the causal chain and serve on the side of Truth. The hour is late indeed. Fortunately, it's not yet too late to open students' eyes, minds, hearts, and souls to the world around them.
Believe me, I certainly don't want to give Medic a chance to dismantle the family unit. If you look back over some of my older letters, you'll see that I predicted that he would make people weak and dependent. And, as I predicted, he did. But you know, that was not a difficult prediction to make. Anyone who has bothered to learn even a little about Medic could have made the same prediction. He has commented that no one is smart enough to see through his transparent lies. I would love to refute that, but there seems to be no need, seeing as his comment is lacking in common sense.
Medic can blame me for the influx of self-centered boneheads if it makes him feel better, but it won't help his cause any. There are two sorts of people in this world: decent, honest folks like you and me and pestilential miscreants like him. What really irks me is that he has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let him use cheap, intemperate propaganda to arouse the passions of perverted loan sharks or he'll popularize a genre of music whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge reckless crooks to ransack people's homes. Medic is willing -- even eager -- to jettison his scruples in order to stay ahead of the pack. Excuse me; that's not entirely correct. What I meant to say is that inasmuch as I disagree with Medic's accusations and find his ad hominem attacks offensive, I am happy to meet Medic's speech with more speech and, if necessary, continue this discussion until the truth shines. He says that anyone who disagrees with him is ultimately wretched. You know, I don't think I have heard a less factually based statement in my entire life. That's it for this letter. I sincerely hope that typing it was not a complete waste of energy. Unfortunately, I do realize that my words will probably trigger no useful response in the flabby synapses of Medic's brain. I just felt obligated to go through the motions because the only winners in Medic's games are ambulance services and funeral homes.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My goal for this letter is to warn the public against those selfish, insidious nincompoops whose positive accomplishments are always practically nil, but whose conceit can scarcely be excelled. I shall do this in the only honest way that I can, which is by simply setting forth those principles that I personally believe in and that I personally observe and honor. Let me begin by saying that at this point in the letter, I had planned to tell you that on this subject, we get only a lot of blather and obfuscation from Shin and his adulators. However, one of my colleagues pointed out that if we let him cast the world into nuclear holocaust, civilization itself will fall. Hence, I discarded the discourse I had previously prepared and substituted the following discussion, in which I argue that Shin contends that the rest of us are an inferior group of people, fit only to be enslaved, beaten, and butchered at the whim of our betters. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? Now, I, not being one of the many tendentious adolescents of this world, am all for freedom of speech, but it's hypersensitive for him to undermine liberty in the name of liberty. Or perhaps I should say, it's untoward. Some critics have called Shin shambolic. A handful insist he's mindless. His lieutenants, on the other hand, consider him to be one of the great minds of this century.
Obviously, you shouldn't automatically believe all the allegations I've been making, so let me elaborate a bit. Shin parrots whatever ideas are fashionable at the moment. When the fashions change, his ideas will change instantly, like a weathercock. Although he will go to almost any extreme to prevent my message of truth from getting out, I receive a great deal of correspondence from people all over the world. And one of the things that impresses me about it is the massive number of people who realize that for all of Shin's professed concern for human rights, he has yet to take a firm and unambiguous stand against those harebrained, petty nutcases who caricature and stereotype people from other cultures. If that fact hurts, get over it; it's called reality. And for another dose of reality, consider that I would undeniably like to comment on Shin's attempt to associate exclusionism with vandalism. There is no association. While it is not my purpose to incriminate or exculpate or vindicate or castigate, on several occasions I have heard Shin state that his perversions enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness. I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a comment. What I consider far more important, though, is that Shin says that he is a perpetual victim of injustice. Yet he also wants to gag the innocent accused from protesting favoritism-motivated prosecutions. Am I the only one who sees the irony there? I ask because he wants to promote Dadaism's traits as normative values to be embraced. Faugh. Is there a way to counter Shin's worthless wisecracks? Oh yes, there is a way. It's really quite simple and can be done by any individual. It doesn't cost a thing, monetarily. It requires only time, diligence, and a desire to foster mutual understanding.
Shin will do everything in his power to win support by encapsulating frustrations and directing them toward unpopular scapegoats. No wonder corruption is endemic to our society; Shin needs to stop living in denial. He needs to wake up and realize that if we don't reinvigorate our collective commitment to building and maintaining a sensitive, tolerant, and humane community right now, then Shin's taradiddles will soon start to metastasize until they wiretap all of our telephones and computers. Shin's arguments are full of hair-splitting, lawyer-like quibbling, and references to obscure authorities. That sounds really sexist, but I obviously insist that it's an accurate assessment of the situation. This has been a long letter, but I feel that its length is in direct proportion to its importance. Why? Because Shin's rank-and-file followers are currently in the streets, burning, robbing, and looting.
I don't want to be rude or disrespectful, and I clearly don't want to start an argument, but Medic clings to any argument or principle, however empty-headed or gutless, that appears to support his hastily mounted campaigns. To organize my discussion, I suggest that we take one step back in the causal chain and serve on the side of Truth. The hour is late indeed. Fortunately, it's not yet too late to open students' eyes, minds, hearts, and souls to the world around them.
Believe me, I certainly don't want to give Medic a chance to dismantle the family unit. If you look back over some of my older letters, you'll see that I predicted that he would make people weak and dependent. And, as I predicted, he did. But you know, that was not a difficult prediction to make. Anyone who has bothered to learn even a little about Medic could have made the same prediction. He has commented that no one is smart enough to see through his transparent lies. I would love to refute that, but there seems to be no need, seeing as his comment is lacking in common sense.
Medic can blame me for the influx of self-centered boneheads if it makes him feel better, but it won't help his cause any. There are two sorts of people in this world: decent, honest folks like you and me and pestilential miscreants like him. What really irks me is that he has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let him use cheap, intemperate propaganda to arouse the passions of perverted loan sharks or he'll popularize a genre of music whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge reckless crooks to ransack people's homes. Medic is willing -- even eager -- to jettison his scruples in order to stay ahead of the pack. Excuse me; that's not entirely correct. What I meant to say is that inasmuch as I disagree with Medic's accusations and find his ad hominem attacks offensive, I am happy to meet Medic's speech with more speech and, if necessary, continue this discussion until the truth shines. He says that anyone who disagrees with him is ultimately wretched. You know, I don't think I have heard a less factually based statement in my entire life. That's it for this letter. I sincerely hope that typing it was not a complete waste of energy. Unfortunately, I do realize that my words will probably trigger no useful response in the flabby synapses of Medic's brain. I just felt obligated to go through the motions because the only winners in Medic's games are ambulance services and funeral homes.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My goal for this letter is to warn the public against those selfish, insidious nincompoops whose positive accomplishments are always practically nil, but whose conceit can scarcely be excelled. I shall do this in the only honest way that I can, which is by simply setting forth those principles that I personally believe in and that I personally observe and honor. Let me begin by saying that at this point in the letter, I had planned to tell you that on this subject, we get only a lot of blather and obfuscation from Shin and his adulators. However, one of my colleagues pointed out that if we let him cast the world into nuclear holocaust, civilization itself will fall. Hence, I discarded the discourse I had previously prepared and substituted the following discussion, in which I argue that Shin contends that the rest of us are an inferior group of people, fit only to be enslaved, beaten, and butchered at the whim of our betters. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? Now, I, not being one of the many tendentious adolescents of this world, am all for freedom of speech, but it's hypersensitive for him to undermine liberty in the name of liberty. Or perhaps I should say, it's untoward. Some critics have called Shin shambolic. A handful insist he's mindless. His lieutenants, on the other hand, consider him to be one of the great minds of this century.
Obviously, you shouldn't automatically believe all the allegations I've been making, so let me elaborate a bit. Shin parrots whatever ideas are fashionable at the moment. When the fashions change, his ideas will change instantly, like a weathercock. Although he will go to almost any extreme to prevent my message of truth from getting out, I receive a great deal of correspondence from people all over the world. And one of the things that impresses me about it is the massive number of people who realize that for all of Shin's professed concern for human rights, he has yet to take a firm and unambiguous stand against those harebrained, petty nutcases who caricature and stereotype people from other cultures. If that fact hurts, get over it; it's called reality. And for another dose of reality, consider that I would undeniably like to comment on Shin's attempt to associate exclusionism with vandalism. There is no association. While it is not my purpose to incriminate or exculpate or vindicate or castigate, on several occasions I have heard Shin state that his perversions enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness. I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a comment. What I consider far more important, though, is that Shin says that he is a perpetual victim of injustice. Yet he also wants to gag the innocent accused from protesting favoritism-motivated prosecutions. Am I the only one who sees the irony there? I ask because he wants to promote Dadaism's traits as normative values to be embraced. Faugh. Is there a way to counter Shin's worthless wisecracks? Oh yes, there is a way. It's really quite simple and can be done by any individual. It doesn't cost a thing, monetarily. It requires only time, diligence, and a desire to foster mutual understanding.
Shin will do everything in his power to win support by encapsulating frustrations and directing them toward unpopular scapegoats. No wonder corruption is endemic to our society; Shin needs to stop living in denial. He needs to wake up and realize that if we don't reinvigorate our collective commitment to building and maintaining a sensitive, tolerant, and humane community right now, then Shin's taradiddles will soon start to metastasize until they wiretap all of our telephones and computers. Shin's arguments are full of hair-splitting, lawyer-like quibbling, and references to obscure authorities. That sounds really sexist, but I obviously insist that it's an accurate assessment of the situation. This has been a long letter, but I feel that its length is in direct proportion to its importance. Why? Because Shin's rank-and-file followers are currently in the streets, burning, robbing, and looting.
last edited by
The funniest thing is that this one suits Twi perfectly.
I don't normally talk about how Twi relies on sweeping generalizations to "prove" that the sun rises just for him. However, in this case I'm going to make an exception. I figure it's okay because he makes it his job to scar little children's self-image. Instead of focusing on why he is obviously hiding something, I would like to remind people that he can fool some of the people all of the time. He can fool all of the people some of the time. But Twi can't fool all of the people all of the time. He seems to think that he is right and everybody else is wrong. The same might be said of sexist, footling toughies. As long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, his adulators don't really care that given the amount of misinformation that he is circulating, I must surely point out that all he really wants is to hang onto the perks he's getting from the system. That's all he really cares about. No one can claim to know the specific source of Twi's belief systems, but when Twi tells us that it's okay if his suggestions initially cause our quality of life to degrade because "sometime", "someone" will do "something" "somehow" to counteract that trend, he somehow fails to mention that juxtaposed to this is the idea that his politics represent the most socially inept form of moral turpitude conceivable. He fails to mention that what goes around comes around. And he fails to mention that I am not concerned with rumors or hearsay about him. I am interested only in ascertained facts attested by published documents, and in these primarily as an illustration that the baneful nature of Twi's inclinations is not just a rumor. It is a fact to which I can testify. Although Twi won't admit it, he seeks scapegoats for his own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target he can find, that is, inconsiderate, pudibund lunatics.
Forgive me if I ramble; I'm really upset, as I think you can tell. Even with the increasing number of insolent quiddlers, Twi wants to stultify art and retard the enjoyment and adoration of the beautiful. It gets better: He believes that war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength. I guess no one's ever told him that I cannot promise not to be angry at him. I do promise, however, to try to keep my anger under control, to keep it from leading me -- as it leads Twi -- to turn once-flourishing neighborhoods into zones of violence, decay, and moral disregard. Nothing would make him happier than to see me swallow his diatribes whole, without question or quibble. The denial of this fact only proves the effrontery, and also the stupidity, of sick thieves. Otiose antagonists, motivated by either irreligionism or a desire to lead an evil life, are eager to help Twi toss sops to the egos of the noxious. Now, that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter. So let me corroborate it by saying that Twi's expositions have caused widespread social alienation, and from this alienation a thousand social pathologies have sprung. Perhaps he has some sound arguments on his side, but if so, he's keeping them well hidden; all the arguments I've heard from him are completely snappish.
The biggest difference between me and Twi is that Twi wants to beat plowshares into swords. I, on the other hand, want to take up the mantle and chastise him for not doing any research before spouting off. You may wonder why I proudly adopt this stand. It's simply because his trained seals tend to fall into the mistaken belief that his way of life is correct and everyone else's isn't, mainly because they live inside a Twi-generated illusion-world and talk only with each other.
Twi's victims have been speaking out for years. Unfortunately, their voices have long been silenced by the roar and thunder of Twi's gofers, who loudly proclaim that "metanarratives" are the root of tyranny, lawlessness, overpopulation, racial hatred, world hunger, disease, and rank stupidity. Regardless of those aberrant proclamations, the truth is that he sees no reason why he shouldn't sue people at random. It is only through an enlightened, outraged citizenry that such moral turpitude, corruption, and degradation of the law can be brought to a halt. So, let me enlighten and outrage you by stating that Twi has never satisfactorily proved his assertion that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. He has merely justified that assertion with the phrase, "Because I said so." Twi does not merely trick us into trading freedom for serfdom. He does so consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically. Given his record of shady dealings, we can say that Twi's followers are tools. Like a hammer or an axe, they are not inherently evil or destructive. The evil is in the force that manipulates them and uses them for destructive purposes. That evil is Twi, who wants nothing less than to burn our fair cities to the ground. Let us now join hands, hearts, and minds to reveal some shocking facts about his sound bites.
If Twi thinks that we can change the truth if we don't like it the way it is then maybe he should lay off the wacky tobaccy. Even though supposedly distancing himself from primitive, sinful dossers, he has really not changed his spots at all. The greatest quote I ever heard goes something like this: "Twi still labors under the outmoded pretense that at birth, every living being is assigned a celestial serial number or frequency power spectrum."
The refractory, moonstruck incendiarism I've been writing about is not primarily the fault of perfidious deadheads, nor of the feeble-minded, brutal thugs who extend Twi's 15 minutes of fame to 15 months. It is the fault of Twi. If he succeeds in his attempt to turn the social order upside-down so that the dregs on the bottom become the scum on the top, it'll have to be over my dead body. The largest problem, however, is that he has two imperatives. The first is to understate the negative impact of sensationalism. The second imperative is to force us to experience the full spectrum of the Twi Rainbow of Totalitarianism.
Considering the corruption and foolishness that characterize batty sensualists, nihilism is arguably the most frightening and devastating problem facing us all. I'll stand by that controversial statement and even assume that most readers who bring their own real-life experience will agree with it. At a bare minimum, I feel that Twi has insulted everyone with even the slightest moral commitment. He obviously has none, or he wouldn't force people to act in ways far removed from the natural patterns of human behavior. If he were paying attention -- which it would seem he is not, as I've already gone over this -- he'd see that either he has no real conception of the sweep of history, or he is merely intent on winning some debating pin by trying to pierce a hole in my logic with "facts" that are taken out of context. Now that I've been exposed to Twi's subliminal psywar campaigns, I must admit that I don't completely understand them. Perhaps I need to get out more. Or perhaps Twi operates on an international scale to rip off everyone and his brother. It's only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an international scale, but to step back and consider the problem of Twi's undertakings in the larger picture of popular culture imagery.
A study of irritating, self-righteous dirtbags indicates broad political and ideological agreement on the use of force combined with a set of simple tactics to achieve their immediate goal: to make our lives miserable. Sure, Twi talks the talk, but does he walk the walk? One might as well ask, "Why doesn't Twi point a critical finger at himself for a change?" It is bootless to speculate on the matter, but it should be noted that I'm at loggerheads with Twi on at least one important issue. Namely, he argues that he is a spokesman for God. I take the opposite position, that Twi's underlings want so much to create an unwelcome climate for those of us who are striving to confront and reject all manifestations of ageism that the concept of right vs. wrong never comes up. It is no more complicated than that. He will do everything in his power to talk about you and me in terms which are not fit to be repeated. No wonder corruption is endemic to our society; I want to unify our community. Twi, in contrast, wants to drive divisive ideological wedges through it. What's the difference between his stooges and repressive scum? If you answered "nothing", then go to the front of the class; you're absolutely right.
The popularity of Twi's perorations among uncouth, sophomoric hostes generis humani is a harbinger of daft things to come. By the way, saying that last sentence out loud is a nice way to get to the point quickly at a cocktail party. Please humor me for a moment while I state that I no longer believe that trends like family breakdown, promiscuity, and violence are random events. Not only are they explicitly glorified and promoted by Twi's stultiloquent vaporings, but we must remove our chains and move towards the light. (In case you didn't understand that analogy, the chains symbolize Twi's effete, chauvinistic ethics, and the light represents the goal of getting all of us to bring a fresh perspective and new ideas to the current debate.) There is a simple answer to the question of what to do about Twi's blanket statements. The difficult part is in implementing the answer. The answer is that we must discuss the programmatic foundations of Twi's mischievous, self-centered publicity stunts in detail.
Each liberated mind that examines all of the evidence is a break in the chains that bind us all. (Read as: we have come full-circle.) Mutual efforts against contemptuous unilateralism are not just an educational process designed to teach people that a leopard can't change its spots. These efforts also serve as a beacon, warning the world of the unsympathetic consequences of Twi's profligate criticisms. Twi is out to monopolize the press. And when we play his game, we become accomplices. I have now said everything there is to say. So, to summarize it all, Twi justifies his plans to slander those who are most systematically undervalued, underpaid, underemployed, underfinanced, underinsured, underrated, and otherwise underserved and undermined as undeserving and underclass as "preemptive self-defense".
I don't normally talk about how Twi relies on sweeping generalizations to "prove" that the sun rises just for him. However, in this case I'm going to make an exception. I figure it's okay because he makes it his job to scar little children's self-image. Instead of focusing on why he is obviously hiding something, I would like to remind people that he can fool some of the people all of the time. He can fool all of the people some of the time. But Twi can't fool all of the people all of the time. He seems to think that he is right and everybody else is wrong. The same might be said of sexist, footling toughies. As long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, his adulators don't really care that given the amount of misinformation that he is circulating, I must surely point out that all he really wants is to hang onto the perks he's getting from the system. That's all he really cares about. No one can claim to know the specific source of Twi's belief systems, but when Twi tells us that it's okay if his suggestions initially cause our quality of life to degrade because "sometime", "someone" will do "something" "somehow" to counteract that trend, he somehow fails to mention that juxtaposed to this is the idea that his politics represent the most socially inept form of moral turpitude conceivable. He fails to mention that what goes around comes around. And he fails to mention that I am not concerned with rumors or hearsay about him. I am interested only in ascertained facts attested by published documents, and in these primarily as an illustration that the baneful nature of Twi's inclinations is not just a rumor. It is a fact to which I can testify. Although Twi won't admit it, he seeks scapegoats for his own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target he can find, that is, inconsiderate, pudibund lunatics.
Forgive me if I ramble; I'm really upset, as I think you can tell. Even with the increasing number of insolent quiddlers, Twi wants to stultify art and retard the enjoyment and adoration of the beautiful. It gets better: He believes that war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength. I guess no one's ever told him that I cannot promise not to be angry at him. I do promise, however, to try to keep my anger under control, to keep it from leading me -- as it leads Twi -- to turn once-flourishing neighborhoods into zones of violence, decay, and moral disregard. Nothing would make him happier than to see me swallow his diatribes whole, without question or quibble. The denial of this fact only proves the effrontery, and also the stupidity, of sick thieves. Otiose antagonists, motivated by either irreligionism or a desire to lead an evil life, are eager to help Twi toss sops to the egos of the noxious. Now, that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter. So let me corroborate it by saying that Twi's expositions have caused widespread social alienation, and from this alienation a thousand social pathologies have sprung. Perhaps he has some sound arguments on his side, but if so, he's keeping them well hidden; all the arguments I've heard from him are completely snappish.
The biggest difference between me and Twi is that Twi wants to beat plowshares into swords. I, on the other hand, want to take up the mantle and chastise him for not doing any research before spouting off. You may wonder why I proudly adopt this stand. It's simply because his trained seals tend to fall into the mistaken belief that his way of life is correct and everyone else's isn't, mainly because they live inside a Twi-generated illusion-world and talk only with each other.
Twi's victims have been speaking out for years. Unfortunately, their voices have long been silenced by the roar and thunder of Twi's gofers, who loudly proclaim that "metanarratives" are the root of tyranny, lawlessness, overpopulation, racial hatred, world hunger, disease, and rank stupidity. Regardless of those aberrant proclamations, the truth is that he sees no reason why he shouldn't sue people at random. It is only through an enlightened, outraged citizenry that such moral turpitude, corruption, and degradation of the law can be brought to a halt. So, let me enlighten and outrage you by stating that Twi has never satisfactorily proved his assertion that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. He has merely justified that assertion with the phrase, "Because I said so." Twi does not merely trick us into trading freedom for serfdom. He does so consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically. Given his record of shady dealings, we can say that Twi's followers are tools. Like a hammer or an axe, they are not inherently evil or destructive. The evil is in the force that manipulates them and uses them for destructive purposes. That evil is Twi, who wants nothing less than to burn our fair cities to the ground. Let us now join hands, hearts, and minds to reveal some shocking facts about his sound bites.
If Twi thinks that we can change the truth if we don't like it the way it is then maybe he should lay off the wacky tobaccy. Even though supposedly distancing himself from primitive, sinful dossers, he has really not changed his spots at all. The greatest quote I ever heard goes something like this: "Twi still labors under the outmoded pretense that at birth, every living being is assigned a celestial serial number or frequency power spectrum."
The refractory, moonstruck incendiarism I've been writing about is not primarily the fault of perfidious deadheads, nor of the feeble-minded, brutal thugs who extend Twi's 15 minutes of fame to 15 months. It is the fault of Twi. If he succeeds in his attempt to turn the social order upside-down so that the dregs on the bottom become the scum on the top, it'll have to be over my dead body. The largest problem, however, is that he has two imperatives. The first is to understate the negative impact of sensationalism. The second imperative is to force us to experience the full spectrum of the Twi Rainbow of Totalitarianism.
Considering the corruption and foolishness that characterize batty sensualists, nihilism is arguably the most frightening and devastating problem facing us all. I'll stand by that controversial statement and even assume that most readers who bring their own real-life experience will agree with it. At a bare minimum, I feel that Twi has insulted everyone with even the slightest moral commitment. He obviously has none, or he wouldn't force people to act in ways far removed from the natural patterns of human behavior. If he were paying attention -- which it would seem he is not, as I've already gone over this -- he'd see that either he has no real conception of the sweep of history, or he is merely intent on winning some debating pin by trying to pierce a hole in my logic with "facts" that are taken out of context. Now that I've been exposed to Twi's subliminal psywar campaigns, I must admit that I don't completely understand them. Perhaps I need to get out more. Or perhaps Twi operates on an international scale to rip off everyone and his brother. It's only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an international scale, but to step back and consider the problem of Twi's undertakings in the larger picture of popular culture imagery.
A study of irritating, self-righteous dirtbags indicates broad political and ideological agreement on the use of force combined with a set of simple tactics to achieve their immediate goal: to make our lives miserable. Sure, Twi talks the talk, but does he walk the walk? One might as well ask, "Why doesn't Twi point a critical finger at himself for a change?" It is bootless to speculate on the matter, but it should be noted that I'm at loggerheads with Twi on at least one important issue. Namely, he argues that he is a spokesman for God. I take the opposite position, that Twi's underlings want so much to create an unwelcome climate for those of us who are striving to confront and reject all manifestations of ageism that the concept of right vs. wrong never comes up. It is no more complicated than that. He will do everything in his power to talk about you and me in terms which are not fit to be repeated. No wonder corruption is endemic to our society; I want to unify our community. Twi, in contrast, wants to drive divisive ideological wedges through it. What's the difference between his stooges and repressive scum? If you answered "nothing", then go to the front of the class; you're absolutely right.
The popularity of Twi's perorations among uncouth, sophomoric hostes generis humani is a harbinger of daft things to come. By the way, saying that last sentence out loud is a nice way to get to the point quickly at a cocktail party. Please humor me for a moment while I state that I no longer believe that trends like family breakdown, promiscuity, and violence are random events. Not only are they explicitly glorified and promoted by Twi's stultiloquent vaporings, but we must remove our chains and move towards the light. (In case you didn't understand that analogy, the chains symbolize Twi's effete, chauvinistic ethics, and the light represents the goal of getting all of us to bring a fresh perspective and new ideas to the current debate.) There is a simple answer to the question of what to do about Twi's blanket statements. The difficult part is in implementing the answer. The answer is that we must discuss the programmatic foundations of Twi's mischievous, self-centered publicity stunts in detail.
Each liberated mind that examines all of the evidence is a break in the chains that bind us all. (Read as: we have come full-circle.) Mutual efforts against contemptuous unilateralism are not just an educational process designed to teach people that a leopard can't change its spots. These efforts also serve as a beacon, warning the world of the unsympathetic consequences of Twi's profligate criticisms. Twi is out to monopolize the press. And when we play his game, we become accomplices. I have now said everything there is to say. So, to summarize it all, Twi justifies his plans to slander those who are most systematically undervalued, underpaid, underemployed, underfinanced, underinsured, underrated, and otherwise underserved and undermined as undeserving and underclass as "preemptive self-defense".